about odd sounds
The reading claims that there are some theories about the source of strange sounds, Quakers, that sailors of Russian submarine heard from1960s to 1980s in the North Atlantic and the Arctic Ocean. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and prepares some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that these sounds were caused by whale males to attract female whales during their courtship period. Conversely, the lecturer brings the idea that this theory at first is plausible, however, it is unlikely to be true. Also, it is true the place of the submarine was the general area that whales live. However, whales live near the surface and submarine was placed at the deep of the ocean. Hence, it could not have been heard sounds from near the surface. Besides the whales could be detected by sonar of the submarine.
Second, the reading passage holds the view that the sounds could be caused by giant squid. Since they have soft bodies, they are hard detected by sonar of the submarine. The professor underlines the fact that Russian submarine heard these sounds from the 1960s and reported them for two decades. In addition, after twenty years there is no report from these sounds. However, these animals lived there and also continue to live there. Therefore, there is no reason to suddenly start of these sounds and stopped of them.
The reading asserts that these sounds may have been produced by another military submarine.in contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that if there had been a submarine there, sonar of the submarine would have detected it. In addition, the submarine was not able to change its direction quickly and its engine did not make any noise during a quick change. Moreover, there is no technology has invented until now such as fast and its engine such as silent.
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job 66
- Some people offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. 60
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 60
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8785942492 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2305170797 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533546325879 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.416945957 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8235294118 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112878817265 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357118133575 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044374644822 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633411579738 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247183139885 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.