Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether employees can be hired for their whole lives will bring businesses more benefits have been attracting a great deal of public attention. While some people believe that it is not totally an ideal employee hiring method, I strongly advocate that hiring employees for their lives has advantages and drawbacks.
In terms of benefits, companies seem to have good assistance and advice from experienced workers in plenty of situations. These workers have undergone many difficult cases in their careers, so recruiting workers and training them for a long time will help businesses prevent hardship. For example, if businesses have a recruitment orientation every 2 years, businesses will continuously change the way of operation, which will create a mess in the organization. Besides that, new employees cannot understand the market compared to workers who work in a field for a long time. Furthermore, every business needs management in order to build a good correlation; however, it takes many years for senior management to understand employees, markets, and their own companies. This implies that short-term recruitment will not benefit businesses.
On the other hand, workers have a limit in their capacity when they get older; therefore, suggesting young people with skills and training them to replace old workers can be another method for businesses. With this strategy, businesses can benefit from experienced workers, and little by little, let these young people face arduous situations so that they learn from their predecessors and gain experience. This method will be successful because workers can gain experiences from time to time.
All things considered, businesses should choose a suitable method of recruitment in order to have a good business. Hiring employees for their whole lives can be a good method, but it might have a few drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-06 | quanjun | 90 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | neilyuan | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | Rustin_Panda | 86 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | wally | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | WatermelonUCLA | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 70
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these views 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether employees can be hired for their whole ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34228187919 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87728539191 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553691275168 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0460645228 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.461538462 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239754825019 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977597986718 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860953657863 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179326290465 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093971918367 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.