Classic movies are much better than modern ones.
In the wake of urbanization, most people live in cities today. More people lead to fiercer competition, which means most people now face increasing pressure, and to relieve this stress, they will opt for entertainment. Hence, this is how entertainment becomes an inseparable part of modern life. Although many people prefer watching newer movies, I believe classic ones are more valuable for the following reasons:
To begin with, nowadays, producers are profit-driven and always emphasize making more money rather than focusing on how well their movie is received. As a result, many movie producers choose to cast celebrities based on their popularity instead of their acting skills. These so-called popular actors are preferred over erudite actors. To elucidate, it doesn’t matter what the script is or how the hired actors make awkward expressions and deliver unusual dialogue, but they must have huge fan bases. And their followers will wait in long lines to buy the tickets and make the movie a super hit. That’s why modern films are not worth watching. On contrariwise, ancient films were directed with great precision, taking care of every minute detail. The music, action, drama, and emotions all seemed to be real. Even the characters were more confident. Today not only are films influenced by graphics and animation but also most of the actions are fake, created by various computerized soft wares.
Second, classic films were conducive to a healthier outlook in life. They tend to make one believe more in humanity because most of them present a theme or topic that inspires or motivates viewers to take action. They usually depict the stories with lifelong lessons and morals. On the other hand, present-day movies show misanthropic characters who break all rules and regulations, and the story lines involve drugs, murders, or conspiracies. This has a detrimental effect on the young generation, as they tend to emulate their favorite icons. Moreover, comedy shows like "The Kapil Sharma Show" involve insensitive jokes and negative acts to draw laughter. Also, current shows contain bold and intimate scenes, deterring people from watching them together with the family. For instance, my grandmother used to tell us that, at their time, the whole family would sit together and watch movies. This tells us that the old movies didn’t contain scenes that couldn't be watched with families.
In conclusion, I reaffirm my point of view that classic movies were way better than current movies, as they showed traditional morals and values, were story-driven, and were not made merely for the sake of profit. Current movies, instead, try only to attract the attention of audiences for box office collection.
- Painting of young Jane Austen 78
- Knowledge gained through experience is more important than that obtained by reading books 70
- If you have extra money are you happier giving it to charity or spending it yourself 70
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it Touring historic sites going to markets or shops eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes 70
- Cedar population 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 966, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e old movies didn’t contain scenes that couldnt be watched with families. In conclusio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25629290618 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64976503838 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633867276888 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0058795219 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7083333333 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2083333333 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152322546107 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033581456007 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478038041661 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886837655834 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244295990186 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.