Consider a situation where you are required to learn a challenging new skill. You could learn this skills from someone above you, like a boss or supervisor. Or you could be taught the skills by someone at your own level, like a classmate or colleague. Which would you prefer?
Learning new skills is always a noteworthy objective for thpse who sign up for a particular occupation, and the question of who to choose as a mentor figure in order for the process of understanding novel concepts in the field as efficiently and effectively as possible has always been a point of debate for workers. In the following essay, I will provide my principal reasons as to why being taught by peers will yield more desirable results due to the fact that communicating with a person of similar level is generally easier and the reality that they possess a more up-to-date understanding of subjects compared to higher-ups whose knowledge may be dated.
At most points in my personal life, I have found it to be much more comfortable and thus more productive to converse with individuals of my age on different subjects, be they school or classmates or colleagues from work. I believe the reason for this can attributed to the fact that people from the same generation, due to the similarities in study environments and challenges, are able to connect more effectively. As a more recent example, my current supervisor at a research lab, who is an older gentleman, simple cannot accept nor teach newer ideas mainly as a result of his upbringing in a traditional and strict household. His background being from an older generation certainly does not help communication and thus I opted to ask for a person who had had more experience but was around my age for help on certain tasks and skills.
Another point to take note of is that while managers and bosses may have higher credentials than those they hire, it is a reality that they are no longer in their prime and are very likely not keeping up with revelations and advancements in their current field, and that they may be more preoccupied with managerial duties. Yet another reason as to why I believed that my supervisor was unfit to teach new skills in my work environment was his relative obliviousness to new research and technological trends, including the very recently popular usage of AI modeling in the field of organic chemistry, which is supposedly my manager’s forte. Bear in mind that none of this is meant to imply that he is inadequate with regards to his academic achievements, but rather to highlight that keeping up with affairs relevant to his field had, at some point, no longer been a priority; making it more reasonable to seek help from a person in a similar position and age.
Ultimately, the generalizations that I have made in this text could very well be due to wrong impressions, but we cannot deny the power of a more youthful and flexible mind, especially when it comes to a workplace. It is for these traits that I believe asking for assistance from them to be more effective in learning new skills. As well, talking to someone coming from a similar generational background is also more comfortable.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family members so there s no need for the government to help them 78
- It is very important for students to learn as much as possible before their graduation from university For this reason many schools require students to attend all of their classes in person in order to achieve a passing grade Do you agree or disagree with 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the characteristics of successful leaders is the sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes 85
- Do you agree or disagree Asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach young children 88
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage The yellow crazy ant is one of the world s most destructive invasive species species that are not native to an area bu 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: ABOUT_WHO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of whom to'?
Suggestion: of whom to
...particular occupation, and the question of who to choose as a mentor figure in order for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 755, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...nd thus I opted to ask for a person who had had more experience but was around my age f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, well, while, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2405.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93640528538 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 20.1344086022 204% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.661218433 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 200.416666667 100.406767564 200% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.6666666667 20.6045352989 202% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120012941277 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486509854446 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0201232703846 0.0737576698707 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777891218175 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169756607406 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.1 11.7677419355 188% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.1575268817 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 30.5 10.002688172 305% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.0537634409 183% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.