Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To achieve successful development of a country, a government should spend more money on young children's education rather than on universities'
"education takes a center stage in promoting students to innovate" Tara Westover, Educated, 2018. Which one is important: spending money on young children's education or universities? Although some people think that governments should spend more money on young children's education, as far as I am concerned, spending money on universities is advantageous because it increases the innovation rates, specializes the careers, and it can be deemed as a profitable revenue for governments. In the following, I am inclined to put forth some arguments to support the position.
First and foremost, governments' assigning many budgets on universities can help students to innovate as much as possible. As an illustrated case, the United States government claimed that by increasing the universities budgets from 60 billion dollars in 2005 to 80 billion dollars in 2006, the established patents related to the innovations have been increased. In fact, many innovations play a major role in addressing people's thorny issues, for example, universities' students could provide new solutions to tackle pollution in big cities. Thus, it seems fair to suggest that spending more money on universities rather than children’s education is beneficial.
Another thing coming to the mind is that universities play staple roles in increasing the number of specialists in society. Indeed, bringing up such specialists provides many opportunities for the society, consequently, it will revive the financial system of such countries. For instance, the government of Germany’s supporting universities and researches has altered the country’s fate as a medical tourism goal for patients not only among European countries but also in the world. In other words, nowadays, Germany has a good track record as a pioneer in treating various types of Cancers just because of huge budgets on researches which are provided by both the local and central governments.
Last but not least, it seems that spending much money on universities can reduce greatly the imposed collateral expenditures on the government in comparison with spending money on young people's education. The fact of the matter is that governments are investing money in disparate researches which can be deemed as a profitable investment for them. For example, results derived from scientific researches bolster the financial schemes of governments, attract more foreigner investors, and help the local businesses to flourish. As well as, it helps the government to do more export and reduces unwarranted import. In one word, it assists the governments in financial revenues.
In the nutshell, although some people believe that governments should pay more attention to young people's education financially, I disagree. In fact, I think they should spend more money on universities and related researches. If the governments had spent more money on universities, societies would have utilized the positive consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-04 | tabatabaei.majid1993 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | Mohammadreza1991 | 86 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | Ehsan Razmara | 80 | view |
| 2018-04-22 | saf1990 | 80 | view |
| 2017-12-28 | writing0055 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? All university student should be required to take the history courses no matter what is their major is 73
- what is a very important skill a person should learn? 73
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 54
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 459, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'foreigner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: foreigner
...nancial schemes of governments, attract more foreigner investors, and help the local businesse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ples education financially, I disagree. In fact, I think they should spend more mo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, thus, well, another thing, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2529.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25105035259 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6741089757 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.45 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25878693072 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888864332318 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859485161882 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158680770695 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700058123717 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 10.9000537634 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.