Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Boys and girls should attend separate schools Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Boys and girls should attend separate schools. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Even with the increased standards of education in today's era, co-education is still a controversial issue. Some parents favour sending their children to co-education schools while others prefer single gender schools. Both type of education has its advantages and disadvantages. Considering today's work environment, I am of the opinion that boys and girls should study together in same school. I feel this way for few reasons which I will explain in the following paragraph.

To begin with, it’s a basic human right to be treated equally. Mixed education promotes a sense of gender equality among students and in the society. Students are treated equally by the staff and the classmates. This eliminates feeling of complexity in one gender student from the other gender. My elder brother demonstrates a good example of this. Unlike my orthodox, male dominating family, my brother always treats me (girl) equal to him. He involves me in family talks, he encourages me to learn better and seek higher education. We do healthy discussions and share our opinions with respect. He also assists my mother in household chores sometimes. He always appreciates that have he not had attended mixed school he wouldn’t have learned the right of gender equality.

Moreover, interaction among boys and girls in a controlled environment like school will prepare them for their future career. On the other hand, a student studying in a single gender school could be more shy and less confident to face and work in a unisex work environment. For instance, I did my primary and secondary education in a co- education school. We used to participate in group discussions and debate which were monitored by the teacher in charge of the class. She used to observe and correct us in how to communicate and present our views in a team maintaining respect of girls and boys in the group and be polite, how to be persuasive in correct manner keeping our limitations in mind. That is how I developed my morals, manners and skills of communication with my male and female co-workers at my worksite. However, this is in contrast to my team colleague John, who pursued his education from boy’s school. Consequently, he is hesitant and an introvert in professional team meetings.

In conclusion, co-education is a better choice for children. This is because it will promote sense of equality in them and the society and it will give students the opportunity to develop crucial professional behaviours for their future career.

Votes
Average: 9 (8 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-20 ayumiyazaki 70 view
2022-07-20 ayumiyazaki 90 view
2022-07-20 ayumiyazaki 60 view
2022-07-20 ayumiyazaki 60 view
2022-07-20 Bill Kang 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user S_Daftari :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...family talks, he encourages me to learn better and seek higher education. We do health...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, moreover, second, so, still, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09685230024 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95337587285 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55205811138 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2836741125 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.52 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0979938210534 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0266671595169 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296249427451 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558771044894 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371173679962 0.0645574589148 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.