do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
colleges and universities should offer students better job preparation before they start working.
Each student in universities and colleges usually wants to have a decent job after graduating, but finding an excellent job is harder today than before. Whether should universities and colleges have responsibility to provide better job applications for students? Some people believe this is not suitable or impossible, because it will increase financial burden of schools. However, from my perspective, I think this plan is beneficial for both students and schools.
First of all, I believe that students who used to take part in job preparations are more likely to find jobs. Purposes of this preparing program are that teaching students designs perfect self-resumes and what they should do during interviews. from my perspective, thanks to this preparing program of our school, I find a job that I am working now. I learn how to make an excellent and attractive resume, and how to effectively response all kinds of questions during interviews. Because of skills learning for this program, I expresses pretty good in interview, I think this was a vital factor that helped me find a job.
Additionally, universities which have this kind of course usually are more attractive for applications. I think students will more likely to apply a school, when they know that a school provides the job-preparing program. Recently, a research from the internet shows that more than 20 percent of universities have designed this job-preparing program, and more than 70 percent of students claims that they will consider this program as a one of main factors when they are applying schools. In this case, this is means that only 20 percent of schools can offer the thing that 70 precent of students are looking forward to.
Admittedly, providing such a job-preparing program might increase financial burden of a school. Hiring professional teachers and providing required teaching devices need a lot of money. Whereas, compared to potential benefits of this program, I believe these costs are inconspicuous. Therefore, it is unwise that not providing this program because of economic problems.
In conclusion, in order to sustain benefits of schools and students, I think colleges and universities should provide the job-preparing program for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-13 | Bingdong Li | 73 | view |
- if you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others you should use e mail and text messages rather than use the telephone or voice messaging 76
- do you think shopping in a small store is better than in a supermarket 76
- if you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others you should use e mail and text messages rather than use the telephone or voice messaging 76
- the most important problems will be solved during our lives time 79
- The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
... what they should do during interviews. from my perspective, thanks to this preparin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'express'
Suggestion: express
... of skills learning for this program, I expresses pretty good in interview, I think this ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...es the job-preparing program. Recently, a research from the internet shows that more than ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, so, therefore, whereas, i think, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3137254902 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03169498944 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504201680672 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3974085466 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.388888889 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208926425591 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777708252291 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715303315495 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132083718205 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524811434983 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.