if you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, you should use e-mail and text messages rather than use the telephone or voice-messaging.
Writing text usually can express opinions more clearly than verballing communication. For instance, one person may hang out your calling when he or she is angry without giving you an opportunity to express your opinions. Furthermore, verballing information may be eliminated easily. Hearing the voice of a person who make you angry may makes you feel angrier. However, writing will be a good way to remove away from others. Quiet reading is easier than quiet listening to others’ talking. However, seldom people will inhabit them to read their emails when they are receiving. In this case, writing can clearly transfer information to recipients.
Writing can help people organize their language and thinking more efficiently. In fact, writing can help one find whether their opinions have more advantages and shortcomings. To imagine one person, James, he is arguing with his father whether he should study physics and music. At the beginning of communication, they began to argue with each other. However, when James sits down to clearly write his standpoint thorough emailing, stating advantages and impossible shortcomings of his standpoint, so he feels that he may win his father comprehend. Not only can writing help people insist for a long time, but can help people have more time for thoughtful thinking and preparation.
Admittedly, using telephones and verballing messages also have advantages. Problems also can be solved quickly through verbal communication. Additionally, many people consider that the verbal communication is more personal. However, in some situation, it will make the situation worser. When people are talking, they prefer to become more emotional, which is not helpful to solve the upsetting problems.
In conclusion, I prefer to use emails and messages to discuss these upsetting problems rather than telephones and the verbal communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-12 | Bingdong Li | 76 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Bingdong Li | 76 | view |
- if you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others you should use e mail and text messages rather than use the telephone or voice messaging 76
- do you agree or disagree with the statement students should be required to study basic science to graduate 71
- do you agree or disagree with this statement the government should provide free internet to the whole citizens 73
- if you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others you should use e mail and text messages rather than use the telephone or voice messaging 76
- do you agree or disagree with the statement that should students take the course taught in a traditional way that teachers speak and student listen or the course that student discuss and talk 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48797250859 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92265566434 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1454242908 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.85 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.55 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170730967756 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540340933012 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089755568762 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150768449387 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127580689365 0.0645574589148 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.