Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this progressive and sophisticated world, governments have to pay more attention about using their budget in support of the art activity. A controversial question, which is often raised in regard is that many people consider that government have to sponsor more in the athletics. While some people are inclined towards this idea that arts provides citizen more opportunities to understand different aspect of culture, others, on the other hand, are against the point of view. As far as I am concerned, my own opinion is that government requires to put more effort on the athletic. In the following essay, I will delve into reasons and examples supporting my viewpoints.
The first noteworthy reason coming to my mind it that governments care about their reputation, as a result, building a strong teams can help them do it. Take my country as an example. My country cultivates many well-known athletics. Therefore, when these athletics have good performance, it gives our country an opportunity to show our reputation and share the honor with them.
The second elaborated reason to be mentioned is that governments wish to increase citizen health, and sponsor more in athletics encourage citizen do more exercise. For instance, nowadays, many people are lack of exercising because of busy working. However, governments put more budget in supporting athletics raise their willingness to do exercise such as constructing a public gym.
Last but not least, the third compelling reason from my viewpoint is that governments wish to increase their income, and supporting athletics assist them to make this target. Holding global competition will bring considerable income for governments. For example, my living city, which is a small city, is difficient of budget. However, once a year, a worldwide event held in my hometown caused the government earn a huge amount of money after the event.
In the conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it is crystal clear that governments should pay more effort on athletics since governments care about their reputation, wish to increase citizen’s health, and increase state's income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- TPO 23 55
- TPO45 In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better to able to make decision about their own lives 73
- TPO 47 3
- Sometimes you are required to meet with another person to provide feedback about that person s work for example when you must give your opinions about a classmate s work on an assignment or your thoughts about a coworker s contribution to a project When y 62
- TPO 20 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'putting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: putting
...own opinion is that government requires to put more effort on the athletic. In the fol...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'team'?
Suggestion: team
...utation, as a result, building a strong teams can help them do it. Take my country as...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31176470588 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94119999991 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5314866858 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.235294118 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254322509807 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766713753026 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715873672917 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137254425602 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621712544619 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.