Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Depending on personal experience personality type and emotional concern, we find that some people hold the idea of supporting of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams, meanwhile others prefer to governments spend more money in support of the arts. From my point of view, it is more advisable to choose to support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams rather than governments should spend more money in support of the arts. My arguments about this are as follows.
The main reason for my propensity for support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams is that exercises can keep fit and strengthen people’s physical ability. For instance, if the governments spends more money on sports equipment, people will have better exercise environments and conditions that allow people to exercise. Many people now have some illnesses because they work long hours and do not exercise. If there are more gyms and fitness equipment, they will stimulate their desire to exercise. Only by doing so can they really improve their physical fitness. Another reason can be seen by every one is that sport competitions contribute to promote the sports spirit of each country. For example, every four years, an Olympic Games will be held. At that time, some countries will send some excellent athletes to compete together. At that time, it is the best time to prove the sports of each country. If the country does not invest more time and money to train good athletes, you will leave a bad impression on other countries. On the contrary, if some countries have some outstanding athletes, then it is proved that these countries are very concerned about sports, they can communicate with other countries sports and they can promote the sports spirit of each country.
Although I agree that there may be a couple of individuals take their side for governments should more money in support of the arts, I feel that the disadvantages are more clear. Take art for example, art spends a lot of time and money, and not everyone is interested in art.
To sum up, sports is the most important part of life. People and the country are paying more and more attention to the development of sports, so I agree that the governments should spend more money in support of athletics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement As modern life becomes more complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 81
- whether people should learn from others or become individual for themselves in order to succeed? 56
- Following the world s development the relationship between people are become better we usually get on well with teachers As we all know because everyone will make mistakes we may find the teachers view contradicts to our view when attending a class or a m 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country a government should focus its budget more on young children s education than on universities 80
- Is the ability to write well more important than that of speaking 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 749, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'game'?
Suggestion: Game
...r example, every four years, an Olympic Games will be held. At that time, some countr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, so, then, while, for example, for instance, i feel, such as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02094240838 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75935229881 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473821989529 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4543920981 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331597386517 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102572427175 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123144287389 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249331975341 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108696775072 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.