Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Being versatile in skills and knowledge is always the boon for people. Some people may believe that having broad knowledge on various academic subject is better than to specialize on only one subject, while others may think that specializing at only one subjects is far more better. In my personal opinion, I contends that having broad knowledge on wide academic subjects is more advantageous. I feel this way for two reason which I would examine in this essay.
First of all, having broad knowledge will make you open to many opportunities, especially open to many job sectors. As, if you have knowledge on the more academic subject than you can have many options, if got rejected on one subject field can apply to another subject field of ones knowledge. Additionally, the knowledge of one subject field can corroborate the another subject and combinely can make you better than other people for job position. For example: There was a friend of mine who was major but average in knowledge of civil engineering. But additionally he had good knowledge of the computer, data science and extension. So, these additional skills make him far more better than other who were specialize on civil engineering only. Conclusively, He got more hold on that job than other specialized one. Had he not have those additional skill, he would not have been guaranteed for the job.
Secondly, Having broad knowledge makes your life more interesting and got free from the boredom in life. The people who are specialized in one field have to bound with the single job through out their life. Such monotonous life can make you feel completely bore and deprived from excitement. If a person would have broad academic knowledge than he can frequently change the job as per time and as per his wish. This can make the excitement continued throughout the life as you need not have to engage on single job. This can be demonstrated through my personal experience. There was my friend who had knowledge of photography, data science, along with his major in Zoology. So, at beginning of his career he started as a lecturer of zoology, later, when he got bored used his photography skills and become a animal photographer. And now when the era of the data science has prevailed, he is doing job as data scientist and working on data of extincting animals. These skills of him made him to do the job that he would enjoy thorough out his life. It was obvious that if he do not have his additional skill he would have ended his life as only lecturer.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the broad academic knowledge is always superior over single specialized one. This is because having broad knowledge not only assure you with a particular job but also makes your life full of excitement. Further it will provide you to gain experience on different field and makes you a perfectionist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... one subjects is far more better. In my personal opinion, I contends that having broad knowledge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'contend'
Suggestion: contend
... more better. In my personal opinion, I contends that having broad knowledge on wide aca...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d can apply to another subject field of ones knowledge. Additionally, the knowledge ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...o, these additional skills make him far more better than other who were specialize on civi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... him far more better than other who were specialize on civil engineering only. Co...
^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'specialized'.
Suggestion: specialized
...im far more better than other who were specialize on civil engineering only. Conclusively...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...field have to bound with the single job through out their life. Such monotonous life can ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 807, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... used his photography skills and become a animal photographer. And now when the e...
^
Line 5, column 1075, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...out his life. It was obvious that if he do not have his additional skill he would ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70801860213 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425101214575 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 766.8 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2591930391 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368522160495 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111234559634 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105973128764 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271467567235 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919407927481 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.