Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Throughout history, jobs have become part of humans’ daily routines. In other words, our society developed so that people had to choose a career to survive. Some experts believe that jobs should bring joy in life; therefore, they suggest that five days a week are more suitable than three days a week with extended hours, while others hold precisely the opposite perspective. I subscribe to the view that working three days a week with longer hours is better. I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, working three days a week would let people organize their life’s schedule beneficially. Generally speaking, most of the employees do not have enough time to take care of other tasks of their life during the week. While their jobs are holding them from other activities, being frustrated, such as working out, shopping, and so on, they are expected to be more active and socially involved in various events. For example, my sister attending her workplace only three days a week which lets her hit the gym on her off-days, and besides, she can cook some proper food during the week. There is no doubt that in those three days employees would be seriously exhausted but, in this way, they can provide themselves more exciting life.
Secondly, families and kids have a prominent role in each one’s life, and without them, life would be meaningless, and it can bring emptiness. Although people would have time to spend with their families even in five days of the week, it is noteworthy that being tired does not let them enjoy this companionship. In three days a week jobs, they can rest during the night, and then they would be able to take their children to other places like playgrounds, amusement parks, picnics, etc. For instance, when I was a little kid, I remember my father was a firefighter; he had to take his shifts on particular days a week, and rest of the week, he took us to nature and played with us. It had a significant effect on him which was his striking demeanor. The results from having such a career can affect people’s mental health and happiness considerably.
Lastly, it is notable that people have been adapted to this routine for a long time, even in our ancestors. They have organized their lives by this procedure, and it is hard to change suddenly. Besides, working three days a week for extended hours would make employees tired, affecting their passion for the job. According to a study, pressure reduction and increasing joy in the work environment cannot be obtained by reducing the workdays. Five days a week can spread work’s stress through days of a week which is more reasonable than being pressure in three days with long hours.
In conclusion, there are several factors that contribute to a job’s enjoyable space. Each of them has its pros and cons, and the decision should be held on employee’s choice and their CEOs.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2407.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82364729459 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56363151356 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517034068136 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0710888176 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.652173913 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6956521739 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08695652174 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329080285208 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101699068613 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888753926132 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203416206371 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105896814441 0.0645574589148 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.