Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Throughout history, the job has played a prominent role in all societies. Due to it is paramount importance worker must pay a suitable time for the career. A controversial question which is often raised this idea about how many days' workers must be spending for doing the jobs. Some people may hold the view that the employee needs only 3 days for doing jobs which beneficial. Some other may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the labor force must do the jobs 5 days and it has more beneficial than 3 days. I personally state that 3 days work is superior to 5 days. In the following paragraph, I will delve into the outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite factor to be mentioned is that the people who work 3 days in the week benefit from flexible time. To elaborate on my point, since the labor force with 3-day work, they can spend many times with their family and children. Hence, they have indulged by having opportunities to 4-day free time so that they can supervisor their offsprings' homework assignment, nutrition, free time activity. Furthermore, the labor force who has 4 days free can stablish strong bond with the children; therefore, they can raise their children as they see fit. A significant example that strikes in my mind about my mother. She was teachers and she worked 3 days a week. Thus, she spent many times with me and my brother, when we were a child. And now, we have a really excellent relationship with each others.
In addition, I believe that the people only work for 3 days can control economical of their life and they have many beneficial sides of economic. In other words, inasmuch as labor force do not work for 3 days, they can save their money that spends on transportation and energy. Also, they can spend their money on better purpose such as buying essential things, travelling and many other situations. Furthermore, since some people do not work rush hours so that traffics, air pollution and energy consumption are decreases. Moreover, the labor force can supervisor their children so that they do not need to spend money on nursing the children.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that three-day work has more beneficial than 5-day work. I assert that the labor force who works 3 days not only have much free time to spend with their family but also can save money and energy. Also, if parents stay at home 4 days, they can better supervise their offspring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- TPO 28 70
- A high school that normally gives students about two months of time off from school during the summer is introducing a new educational requirement for students in eleventh grade (ages 16-17) over the summer, students have the following two options to fulf 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important way to improve people s health is to clean the environment 45
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are moreimportant. Which do you prefer and why? 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73023255814 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58235473477 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4570796914 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4347826087 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6956521739 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252031729292 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859806963279 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610467714261 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173511238801 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381109889204 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.