Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

For the development of the modern city, the investment in each aspect is a significant issue all the time. However, due to the limited budget, the government should use the funding publicly and precisely. Some people may think that the government should invest more on improving internet access, while others consider that input funding in public transportation can gain far more benefits. In my opinion, I am for the latter.

To begin with, only by developing public transportation can general people augment the life standard enormously. Since the more efficient transport vehicle, the more precious time can be conserved, further transfer to productivity in the various regions. For instance, the general public can exploit the remaining time to deal with business or catch their breath, during which they are possible to obtain satisfaction in both physically and mentally. Thus, through advanced transportation, general people can sustain the living balance.

Lastly, it is a significant approach that defends the ecosystem from contamination. If there scarce public transport way, people will supplant by driving the domesticated vehicle and emitting the amount of carbon dioxide vastly. In other words, which will cause a large amount of injury to the public's health in the long-term. Hence, for the farsighted concern, the value of tapping transportation is way over internet access.

It should be no doubt that by improving internet access, people can maintain the relationship from the ordinary to the worldwide spectrum conveniently and effortlessly. Nevertheless, through the internet, the connection is fragile and virtual. By contrast, qualified transportation can succeed the virtually tangible contact to the intimate association. Furthermore, which is able to relate to the whole class of people certainly, like the juvenile and the aged. Consequently, I still think that public transportation is far more favorable to gain immense investment.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-21 Take 70 view
2023-04-08 younessam 70 view
2023-03-13 Mohf89 70 view
2023-03-13 saharmnd 76 view
2023-03-13 saharmnd 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user hazel8072 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gain far more benefits. In my opinion, I am for the latter. To begin with, o...
^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...he various regions. For instance, the general public can exploit the remaining time to deal ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... carbon dioxide vastly. In other words, which will cause a large amount of injur...
^^
Line 12, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...l cause a large amount of injury to the publics health in the long-term. Hence, for t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for instance, no doubt, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67558528428 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09711637527 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591973244147 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4741385271 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8235294118 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76470588235 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.53405017921 353% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210493588476 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063262360202 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519421971011 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647699778188 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524762243811 0.0645574589148 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.