Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

By improving the humankind's lifestyle and increasing in the population of countries, governments play a crucial role. Their decision affect all aspects of one nation. One of the aspect governments should percisely decide about it is how they should invest their money which they borowed from people by taxes. For example they can invest in Internet network or public transportaition or road maintainace. All of them need funding, but I think government should always attend specially to improve of public transportation. There are some advantages to this view, and in this essay, I will elaborate on two of my most important reasons.

The first and most important resaon is that ordinary people use tranportation system regularly. In my country, most of the people have not proper economical situation. Hence most of them had not private cars. On the other hand, the modern lifestyle and new work enviornment inquire people to travell long distance. Without car and this requirenment, imporve of transportation systems shuold be noticed by the government particularly. There are severe defect in the transportation system of my country. Most of the urban cities have not subway or BRT. These project need money to implement.

The second noteworthy point I want to mention is that imporvement of public transportation is enviornmental friendly. Nowadays humankind hurt their sorrounding nature extremely. On of these harmfull effect is creating pollutant. Recent investigation shows that people who have car use their cars for travelling more than five kilometeres, three times a day, and two times are unneccessary trips. So the governments should ban their trips to exist less poloutat in the urban area. One of the basic work for implement these rules is improve the public transportation.

In sum, I firmly believe that governments should pay especially attention to transportation systems. Some reason leed me to this viewpoint, chief amngs them is there should be a proper tranportation system for ordinary people, which create the major of the society. Aside from this reason, enhancing the public transportation help enviornment in possitive way.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...try, most of the people have not proper economical situation. Hence most of them had not p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e have not proper economical situation. Hence most of them had not private cars. On t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'defects'?
Suggestion: defects
...vernment particularly. There are severe defect in the transportation system of my coun...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...basic work for implement these rules is improve the public transportation. In sum, I...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, so, for example, i think, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38053097345 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10419806574 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563421828909 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9635921759 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3043478261 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7391304348 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21739130435 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189324861122 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488716577826 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430629148846 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111363308348 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333243661602 0.0645574589148 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.