Nowadays, with the rapid development of new technologies, some people reckon that children are more proficient in absorbing the most up-to-date information, while their parents cannot keep pace with the fast-paced modernization process. Thus, some people contend that parents can learn more from their children. However, as far as I’m concerned, children can learn as much as their parents can learn from them.
On the one hand, family education is, and will remain, essential for children’s upbringing, because parents not only own lots of valuable life experiences that can enlighten their children but also can educate children about attitudes and values, goods and evils, rights and wrongs, etc. Although children can have all the latest facts at their fingers, expanding knowledge through the Internet and new technologies, they are not mature enough to make good judgments. After all, these moral lessons cannot be easily learned by children on their own without parents’ guidance and instruction. My personal experience is a prime example of this point. Back in primary school, I always watch videos on the Internet. At that time, I was unaware that some videos contained violence and dirty words. Although my parents were unfamiliar with these online websites, they pointed these issues out and helped me find more suitable videos to watch.
On the other hand, we have to admit youngsters’ ability to learn new things is remarkable, and children can make full use of new knowledge that their parents may not know. Without doubts, children will gain profound and comprehensive knowledge through various channels, including multifarious applications and websites. Needless to say, schools provide children with an enriched curriculum and the depth of each subject is greater than they were before. Take programming as an example. Many parents rarely have opportunities to familiarize themselves with basic programming knowledge, and they don’t have enough time and energy to indulge in learning it. When they need to utilize programming in the workforce, their children whose compulsory subjects include programming can provide help. Children can help their parents to tackle even the simplest mistakes or problems with programming. In addition, during this process, children may also provide unique suggestions for their parents’ work.
In a nutshell, both children and their parents can learn from each other from different perspectives. There is no need to hold a biased view toward this issue, underestimating the advantages of any parts. Thus, I believe that combing the advantages of both parents and children can generate more excellent results, benefiting both family and society.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform 87
- If you are going to travel to a city for the first time but you have a limited amount of time which of the following do you think would be the best way to know about the city in a short time touring historical sites going to shops and markets eating in lo 73
- Do you agree with the following statement? Do people benefit more from traveling in their own country than in a foreign country? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern days parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents 78
- Many organizations try to draw people s attention to serious problems such as climate change or poverty These organizations often use images photographs and videos to motivate people to take action against those problems Some organizations use sad images 90
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, while, after all, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50717703349 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80383183369 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569377990431 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8403042641 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.619047619 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513793227934 0.236089414692 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165849210053 0.076458572812 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155324443347 0.0737576698707 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355382133649 0.150856017488 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101094377236 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, while, after all, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50717703349 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80383183369 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569377990431 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8403042641 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.619047619 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513793227934 0.236089414692 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165849210053 0.076458572812 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155324443347 0.0737576698707 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355382133649 0.150856017488 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101094377236 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.