Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
Generosity and helping poor people are some of the best characteristics of humans. It is advised in many different ways in almost all of the religions and cultures around the world. Society is often divided on when people were more generous, today or in the past. I disagree with the idea that people are more eager to help nowadays. There are two reasons why I subscribe to this idea, which are separately elaborated upon in the following essay.
First, recognizing real poor people from fake ones is more difficult now. To explain more, in the past just people who were in trouble asked others for help and when someone came across with one of them could decide easily to help or not. However, these days many deceivers are not poor and just pretend to catch money easily without any effort. Take my experience as an example, last year I was in the airport waiting in line to take my passing card. Suddenly, a woman got close to me and asked for money very politely to buy a ticket to her home. I helped him but a man standing in line next to me told me that he saw that woman the previous week at the same place begging people. As a result, it is very hard for charitable people to decide to help or not.
Second, in the past money had a less important role in human life, therefore, giving it to the poor was easier. Nowadays, economic issues have a prominent role in life, people work very hard most of their lives to gain money then fulfill their dreams. There is always a list of incomplete ambitions in the mind of every person, therefore, they plan for each penny carefully. With regards to this importance, being generous is more difficult. There is a story in our culture about a generous religious leader who gave all the food in his house to the poor behind the door who was hungry. In contrast, people now have big fridges full of food in their houses but even do not answer the ring if someone asks for food.
To sum up, I firmly believe that people in the past were more kind and giving. This was because just real poor asked for help, however, deciding to help was easy, also money or other materials were of less importance that made it easier to donate.
- tpo 62 integrated 68
- tpo 55 integrated 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...acteristics of humans. It is advised in many different ways in almost all of the religions and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...dvised in many different ways in almost all of the religions and cultures around the world...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, in contrast, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43142144638 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27920624933 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556109725686 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2415277392 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.85 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.05 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280326697036 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087691733683 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734722334336 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174792469203 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335736638738 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.