There is no denying that we as Homo sapiens live in a society and contact with people possessing a different attitude toward different issues. Therefore, always this notion was proposed that whether being different from others is good or you should insist on your own idea even the results are unpleasant. The following essay takes an elaborating look at to be successful what type of treatment is decent and finally reach a logical conclusion.
At commenc, those who advocate the viewpoint of being different can be brought us striking outcomes, have some reasons for supporting. Indeed, they say that being different shows ones courage to loudly declare what passes through his mind. In fact, having this characteristic can make several sense. Firstly, the sense of being stubborn, which subsequently testifies the accuracy of that statement. Secondly, it means that there are other voices that should be heard. Thirdly, it is a kinde of portest against some cruel conditions. Fourth, to demonstrate that cuurrent mindsream is irrational. For instance, sometimes based on the previous experience you know that making this decision would ensue destructive results. In this situation, the best and only way is to aware the others by taking the opposite perspective.
Conversely, it is not merely to oppose every facing topics, for your saying you should provide strong reasons. Although sometimes disagreeing with a common notion is dangerous, one must say the truth. The Galileo would be an ideal sample here. While all people had not dared to express their idea for even trivial cases, the Galileo stood and openly claimed his assertion. In this regard, a group of sociologists and psychologists carried out an investigation at ANU University to find out that those are similar to others are more prospered or individuals that try to be different. Ultimately, they announced that the second group becomes successful than others.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that, similarity makes no differenc. Admittedly, prominent people always thought different and try to analyze everything rather than accept it blindly.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, Professional athletes, such football and basketball player, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 83
- 58. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people's lives have already taken place. 76
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep following them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better? 90
- Do you agree or disagree：the best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers’salary. 80
- Are environmental issues too complex to be handled by the individual? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ed, they say that being different shows ones courage to loudly declare what passes t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sense seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some sense'.
Suggestion: some sense
...ct, having this characteristic can make several sense. Firstly, the sense of being stubborn,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erything rather than accept it blindly.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in fact, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32080924855 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85824707306 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632947976879 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2885161339 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.05 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281073986976 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695926061685 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584674728201 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152723704036 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717902614738 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.