Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict
As the society prospers, it is becoming more and more common that people pursue and advocate the value of freedom. However, there is a heated debate about whether the rules that prompts the young to follow are too harsh. As far as I am concerned, I will definitely not vote for the statement, and the following paragraphs will vindicate my viewpoints.
First of all, with the prevalence of education and technology, people are imparted enough knowledge thus possessing critical thinking and having open-minds to deal with the ever-changing world. Therefore, there is no regulation that can restrain them. To illustrate, in the past, persons had no awareness of their rights, and just obeyed what they had been told. Hence, no matter how unreasonable the rules are, they just followed and kept silent. The rigid rules significantly restricted the behavior of people. Nowadays, however, if there is anything irrational, individuals will put forward at once. the rules and people just have a relationship with balance in that people now realize that rules are tools for harmony, not for constraint.
Secondly, Just as what I mentioned above, due to the open minds, people can accept anything new and be accommodating to the trend. we are no longer told what we must do. For instance, my mother once had a dream to be an engineer. My grandparents, however, were really opposed to that because in their opinion, women should be a housewife after marriage or something like nurse. Thus, on account of the culprit of stereotypes, she gave in and studied in nursery school. Nevertheless, that sort of tragedy has declined enormously owing to the accommodating concepts.
In a nutshell, although there are still some rules for the youths to follow, I consider those are actually used for social stability. In view of the multi-value concepts and consciousness of rights of mankind, That is why I think today's rules for youngsters are loosened up compared to people in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | Chloe4112002 | 90 | view |
- Rembrandt 3
- whether it is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 76
- the young are more able to take risk and learn new things than the elderly 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
As the society prospers, it is becoming ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ragraphs will vindicate my viewpoints. First of all, with the prevalence of edu...
^^
Line 2, column 605, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
..., individuals will put forward at once. the rules and people just have a relationsh...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tools for harmony, not for constraint. Secondly, Just as what I mentioned above...
^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... new and be accommodating to the trend. we are no longer told what we must do. For...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y owing to the accommodating concepts. In a nutshell, although there are still ...
^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ened up compared to people in the past.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, sort of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03058103976 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8851359395 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599388379205 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8504921977 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3888888889 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229387647107 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579307039345 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582781997857 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133314508383 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707159788623 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.