In this era, due to the high competition between different businesses or companies, each group in this competition needs to have several managers to deal with and organize problems. Decision-making by managers is a crucial factor that determines whether the business would succeed in the future. Some people believe that decisions should be made only by leaders, while others think reversely. From my perspective, successful leaders should make others involved in decision-making because of two reasons, which I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, decision-making by the whole group improves efficiency. Decision-making brings about this feeling in all persons that they are beneficial members of the business. When a leader pays attention to the others and asks them to give their ideas, members consider the whole team as a family, and they put all their efforts into giving their best ideas. The more they try to make a better decision, the more they would match each other. Consequently, their relationships improve, and these good relationships between members have many benefits for the business, like the enhancement of the company’s efficiency. I know some companies which have failed due to the high tension between members and leaders caused by the low participation of members in decision-making.
Secondly, by involving others in the decision-making, leaders can realize the best decision. Each business has a minimum of 4-5 members, which means 4-5 various ideas for that decision. By hearing all opinions, leaders can recognize the failures or the successful parts of their decision and eliminate the failures and replace them with successful ideas. For instance, always in our tech start-up, which releases mobile phones’ applications, leaders have wanted the other members to give their technical or non-technical ideas about the applications before their lunching. In this way, members have given perfect ideas to their leaders, and leaders also check the views, and if they are useful, they would consider them. As a result, the company always has been in top start-ups in the field of programming.
To wrap it up, leaders need to make other members part of decision-making because a business is like a family whose members benefit equally from success. Therefore, they put all their efforts into making the best decision; hence, their relationships improve. Good relationship enhances the business’s efficiency. Also, members have different ideas and look at the problem from various sights. Therefore, leaders can get help from all these ideas to reduce the failure of their decision or plan. The more the loss reduces, the more the success reaches.
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 76
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 50
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most ofthe large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had becomeextinct Y et humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions be 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as for, as to, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39243498818 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99663644582 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498817966903 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0372648196 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.681818182 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2272727273 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259859044862 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869762246598 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897626060028 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186842953823 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628830321136 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.