Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the
subject being taught.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I would like to disagree with the statement “A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more
important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught”. A teacher could not relate with
students without strong idea of the subject. Teachers are impressed by students due to their
capability of handling the subject.
Merely a teacher with ability to communicate with students could not be useful to the student for
their improvement in subject. Students need explanations and deep knowledge in the subject that
would be provided by a knowledgeable teacher only.
A teacher with good relationship with students but with limited information in subject may be good
in initial days of their class up to the introduction to a class, but once the students come to know the
teacher is lacking subject familiarity even the respect and importance of that teacher will be
reducing. Teacher can get significant importance only due to their extra ordinary knowledge and
capability of explaining concepts. Today students are in need of guidance and provoking, a
knowledgeable teacher can only ignite their mind and useful for students future.
There will be different level of students present in a class. Each student is unique in their
understanding level of the subject and its concept. A brilliant teacher can improvise all the students
according to their level of intellectuality.
A well pleasing teacher without excellent knowledge is not even useful to the organisation and the
society. A teacher mingling with students can not satisfy them without in-depth acquaintance. A
teacher with subject facts and advancement can give brilliant students to the society. Today the
society is in extreme need of technology, that cannot be offered and handled by a teacher with
pleasing character alone, but that can only be offered by an intellectual teacher who can be always
informative to the students. A teacher should have an understanding ability to acquire new concept
and upcoming technology to take the students to next level. How a teacher with soft manners and
kind relationship only can drag the students to next level of understanding in subject? Hence I would
disagree for the statement “A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than
excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.”
- Some believe that government should take care of retirees while others think everyone should save for their own retirement 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Every Individual should spend at least a year living in a foreign country Provide reason and examples to support your opinion 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to be a follower than a leader 73
- mother plays a better role in bringing up children rather than father do you agree or disagree 77
- mother plays a better role in bringing up children rather than father do you agree or disagree 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 18, column 10, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...l to the organisation and the society. A teacher mingling with students can not ...
^
Line 18, column 95, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sfy them without in-depth acquaintance. A teacher with subject facts and advance...
^
Line 24, column 89, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...next level of understanding in subject? Hence I would disagree for the statement “A ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35828877005 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98979265724 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401069518717 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.138959456 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61111111111 5.45110844103 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 26.0 4.53405017921 573% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439427495279 0.236089414692 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194822644677 0.076458572812 255% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156467258645 0.0737576698707 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164213870378 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13236769409 0.0645574589148 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.