Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinions.
Television as one of the most important inventions of 20th century has effected on human life more than expected to do. Indeed, in first days of its production in large numbers, TV was a novel technology to help to human communications however time has changed usefulness of this magic box to a harmful object in men hand. I believe TV could take bad effects on relationship between friends and families. This view in my mind supported by two following main reasons.
The first and the most logical reason is about the time which people spend on watching TV that turn to interaction with family or friends. Result of a new research in my country indicates that every normal person spends about 10 hours in average on watching TV which is a gigantic number when you aggregate this number for a family that includes 4 members. My person experience is a compelling example of this, my father was at work more than 10 hours per day and also he was busy at the lunch time by TV which made his body present at home but he was mind absented at the same time.
Secondly, watching TV makes people lazy which means they prefer to sit on the sofa instead of going out with their friends or family members. Hence, TV could cause problems in gathering people in a same place to be. For instance, My cousin watches all TV program related to sports nevertheless he is over-weighted and do not exercise one minute per week. Consequently, when I called him to join us for an interesting plan, he didn’t accept, nor to do sports neither to go to the stadium of his favorite soccer team. Broadly speaking, TV could have influence on human mind as an addictive drug which make them inactive and lazy.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that TV as a communication tool to the outer world could make the inner places (such as home, workplace, etc.) unfavorable. This is because of the time people spend on watching television and because of influence on human body and mind to do less than before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Bashir Ahmad Faizi | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | NIMA SAEEDI | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | alta | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | jeffhjz | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | rahulsingh773 | 70 | view |
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 66
- TPO 53- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a nu 90
- Independent writing TPO 51 3
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific examples and reasons for your answers. 70
- Independent writing TPO 51 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'new research'.
Suggestion: new research
...ction with family or friends. Result of a new research in my country indicates that every norm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unfavorable
...er places such as home, workplace, etc. unfavorable. This is because of the time people spe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, broadly speaking, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57865168539 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63723657029 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7873352586 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.45110844103 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0960939709695 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367678782311 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0237644061897 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634445300152 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281589085005 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.