Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Whereas some students prefer to work alone on projects assigned by their teachers, I prefer working with a group of students. In this following essay, I will further explore my reasons to base my stance.
Firstly, working together provides more ideas from different students. The collaboration of many students together leads to brainstorming. Thus, out-of-the-box revolutionary ideas come to the light. Apple- the famous technology company- is a compelling example of this concept. Steve Jobs was an ambitious student who dropped out of college and started his own company. He included other intelligent young people in his company. As a result of working together with his young team, he made a leapfrog and created the company's first innovative personal computer at the time. This computer- Apple 1- has no monitor, keyboard, or mouse. If he hadn't collaborated with his peers, we wouldn't have enjoyed the experience today.
In addition, working with a team keeps the students motivated when they feel less enthusiastic. Working on a project could be harsh and exhausting sometimes. Some students find it challenging because they don't have enough academic and practical background. However, working with other students keep their focus on the project. Take my personal experience as an example. When I was in dental school, I had to finish a project that was required for my graduation. Thus, I figured out the best way is to create a study team so we could help each other out with our projects. Accordingly, we kept each other motivated and exchanged information that helped a lot with my project. Luckily, I got a good grade for my project and my collaboration with my peers.
To sum up, working with a team is beneficial to the students. They get exposed to different horizons and standpoints that help their progress. Also, Knowledge exchange with other students keeps their attention on their projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When doing research it is better to use printed materials such as books and articles than it is to use the Internet Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Proffessor shows on TV show 76
- in many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages 76
- In the united states employees typically work five days a week for eight hours however many employees want to work a four day week 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 640, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...s no monitor, keyboard, or mouse. If he hadnt collaborated with his peers, we wouldnt...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 678, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...e hadnt collaborated with his peers, we wouldnt have enjoyed the experience today. In...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...udents find it challenging because they dont have enough academic and practical back...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, whereas, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13461538462 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89774788427 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9829393452 48.9658058833 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.652173913 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5652173913 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4347826087 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271208560943 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784191459602 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720171904412 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166401778813 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567699950962 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.