Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Whereas some students prefer to work alone on projects assigned by their teachers, I'd rather work with a group of students. In this following essay, I will further explore my reasons to base my stance.
Firstly, working together provides more ideas from different students. The collaboration of many students together leads to brainstorming. Thus, out-of-the-box revolutionary ideas come to the light. Apple- the famous technology company- is a compelling example of this concept. Steve Jobs was an ambitious student who dropped out of college and started his own company. He included other intelligent young people in his company. As a result of working together with his young team, he made a leapfrog and created the company's first innovative personal computer at the time. This computer- Apple 1- has no monitor, keyboard, or mouse. If he didn't collaborate with his peers, we wouldn't have enjoyed the experience today.
In addition, working with a team keeps the students motivated when they feel less enthusiastic. Working on a project could be harsh and exhausting sometimes. Some students find it challenging because they don't have enough academic and practical background. However, working with other students keep their focus on the project. Take my personal experience as an example. When I was in dental school, I had to finish a project that was required for my graduation. Thus, I figured out the best way is to create a study team so we could help each other out with our projects. Accordingly, we kept each other motivated and exchanged information that helped a lot with my project. Luckily, I got a good grade for my project and my collaboration with my peers.
On the other hand, collaborating with other students might have some drawbacks. For instance, students will engage in much socializing and waste thier time rather than focusing on their main project. But, once the students are aware students are
To sum up, despite the disadvantages, working with a team is beneficial to the students. They get exposed to different horizons and standpoints that help their progress. Also, Knowledge exchange with other students keeps their attention on their projects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...on projects assigned by their teachers, Id rather work with a group of students. I...
^^
Line 2, column 640, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s no monitor, keyboard, or mouse. If he didnt collaborate with his peers, we wouldnt ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 677, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...he didnt collaborate with his peers, we wouldnt have enjoyed the experience today. In...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...udents find it challenging because they dont have enough academic and practical back...
^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...once the students are aware students are To sum up, despite the disadvantages, wo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17514124294 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88173809363 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570621468927 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8080632053 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.28 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.16 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294878188196 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833638151957 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072591697579 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170589925337 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531218980018 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.