Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before? Why?

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.

No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of having different professors. Still, If I were forced to choose, I would definitely choose to take courses with professors whose classes I have never taken before. It is my firm belief for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, each professor has his/her unique perspective on the subject, and I can learn something different from each one. Therefore it can be better to have different professors. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. In my first year of university, I had Mathematic 1 and Mathematic 2 with the same professor, and I did only learn the way my professor solved problems in contrast to my friends, which had different professors that could the same problem in several ways. To me, learning a new way of thinking about a subject is more interesting than repeating the same way over and over, and it can be helpful to learn a new way of thinking about the solution. As a result, I think having a new professor is really helpful.
Secondly, in each course usually, one professor teaches the subject the best. Besides, if a professor is good at teaching a course, there is no guarantee that she or he is good at teaching other subjects. Drawing from my own experience, in my high school, we, the student, loved Miss Yazdani, and she was excellent at teaching us physics in the second year. For this reason, we asked to be our physics teacher in the third year. However, it was different from what we thought. To illustrate, she was great at mechanics, which we learned in the second year. On the other hand, she had no experience in teaching optical science, which was taught in the third year, and consequently, it was not a good choice to have the same teacher. Moreover, it was difficult for her too. She needed to prepare for everything and was always exhausted. It's certainly clear to see why you need different professors for different courses.
In light of the reasons mentioned, I strongly believe that because of the unique way of looking at things and different quality of teaching for professors, everyone could benefit from having courses with different professors.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-24 RAIdooo 73 view
2023-04-10 KimiaKermanshahian 85 view
2022-12-02 Storyline 90 view
2022-12-02 Storyline 73 view
2022-12-02 Storyline 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user zahrap :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...earn something different from each one. Therefore it can be better to have different prof...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, i think, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76130653266 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75021434574 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51256281407 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1978307156 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175178073016 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511750049529 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636635177677 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107765409356 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391770112373 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...earn something different from each one. Therefore it can be better to have different prof...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, i think, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76130653266 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75021434574 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51256281407 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1978307156 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175178073016 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511750049529 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636635177677 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107765409356 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391770112373 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.