Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The emergence of the Internet provides new opportunities for communication. With the Internet, everyone can convey to another in different ways. For example, when you want to be in contact with your family, friends, colleagues or professors, the Internet facilitates these communications through social media, E-mail , etc. But, in some situations, if you do not use the Internet to communicate it will be better. For instance, you want to discuss about a subject with your friends. It will be better for every one of you to do this conversation in person. So, I agree with the statement about sharing ideas of a project with classmates or colleagues instead of using E-mail service. I hold my point of view by bringing some pieces of evidence in what follows hereunder.
The first and foremost, sometimes you cannot share your ideas through E-mail. I mean maybe your idea seems incorrect and be mistaken but when you illustrate your idea in person in the presence of others, you can share it properly and everyone will recognize your idea's conception. For example, I as an individual did a project about polymers about three years ago. I sent an E-mail to my co-worker and report him the problem happened during the process but, he neglected the situation. When I met him and told how the problem can affect our project, he understood and help me to eliminate it.
Secondly, when you are in the presence of your classmates every idea that comes out from other minds will help you to introduce a new way of handling the project. For instance, my friend had a situation in analyzing her samples and did not know which test method is better for her samples. When she illustrates her problem in our research group, other members help her to efface her problem as soon as possible. If she sent an E-mail to someone and ask for help, she must wait for a response till now.
To sum up, communicate with other people through E-mail is beneficial and is also time-saving but there are some situations which it would be better to share the ideas and discuss about a special subject in person with your classmates or colleagues especially when you want to do a project because of using other thinkings and flickering the new ideas to handle the matter.
- Now Parents are more involved in their children's education than the parents in the past. 66
- Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO 57 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...munications through social media, E-mail , etc. But, in some situations, if you do...
^^
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the new ideas to handle the matter.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, i mean, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79434447301 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6986981545 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493573264781 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4354582218 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.611111111 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365043622924 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119914933967 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840862924379 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233649903176 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817776261156 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.