Face to face communication is better than other modes of communications. Do you agree or not?
With an increasingly large amount of information available in society, the methods of communication have also advanced. Various people have different ideas regarding the best mode of communication. While some believe that face-to-face communication is superior to other forms, others tend to believe that letters, emails, or even telephones are better. I believe that indirect forms of communication are preferable to face-to-face interaction. I have mainly two major reasons to substantiate my point, which I will discuss in the following paragraphs.
First, emails and telephones are better than direct face-to-face interactions because they are more convenient. They allow students and business people to ask for, send, or convey information more instantly. For instance, a person who needs to report his boss, who is present in another country, can conveniently give him a call. Instead, if he had been required to meet his boss face-to-face, it would have taken a lot of time and delayed further proceedings. An essential element of increasingly global business is time. Information should be relayed in a timely fashion, something that face-to-face communication does not allow. Similarly, students are also able to exchange information about the projects by sharing the required material through email rather than carrying the books along with them and scheduling time with teammates and teachers.
Moreover, telephones and conference calls create new possibilities for getting things done conveniently. Many job interviews are done on Skype and with webcams. If a potential job candidate has to apply for a job overseas, he or she doesn’t need to show up in person; instead, the interview can be conducted using advanced gadgets. This greatly increases efficiency and helps employers sift through all the candidates without all the fuss. Likewise, instead of travelling from one place to another to meet people, one can easily connect with them through these modes.
In conclusion, I reaffirm my point of view that one should prefer to communicate through mail and telephones instead of face-to-face communication. By using this mode of communication, people get additional convenience in their professional and academic lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-13 | Anurag96 | 76 | view |
| 2020-08-08 | minhtruong12345679 | 60 | view |
- People should alway try to do something new in their lives 70
- Does being a successful person is to earm a lot of money 73
- Declining population of cedar tree species 80
- Development in technology can led people to enjoy longer lives 80
- What do you think is most important to a lasting friendship The other party can help they have the same interests and worldviews about what matters they trust each other 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 553, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely fashion" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... is time. Information should be relayed in a timely fashion, something that face-to-face communicat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55263157895 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18121264319 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622807017544 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1967889479 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9473684211 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302988126717 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919088961112 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121927829041 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18878202675 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120797706234 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.