Good teachers set challenging tasks to their students
People often love those who give them easier tasks. The same truth is valid for students. Many of them may argue that good teachers are those who do not make their life harder. Only a few of them are open to challenges because they recognize the great advantage of challenges in life. Good teachers should set challenging task to their students.
Professor need to understand that they are meant to develop growth mindset in their students. Carol Dweck, a psychologist at Stanford University, showed in her study of mindset that students who have a growth mindset enjoy studies more when they are challenged while others take courses as an humiliating thing because they fear failure. Due to the fact that the goal of studying is not to be humiliated, professors should focus more on the bright side and make sure students enjoy the courses. Developing a growth mindset in students will require the instructor to set difficult goals to students and require them to accomplish them as well as help them with strategies to succeed next time. It is important that educators create passion in their students, and the best way to do so is to create a growth mindset in them.
Challenges help people understand the real meaning of life. If students succeed all the time, they might think that everything will be a success to them, which is not accurate. Antoine de Saint Exupery, a french writer said that a man discover his strength when he compares himself to obstacles. When professors compare they students to obstacles and difficult tasks, they help them know what are their abilities. It is vital that professor help their students understand what they are good at so that they improve.
In conclusion, professor should keep setting challenging targets to their students to help them develop and grow. When students are doing challenging tasks, they are aware of their strengths and weaknesses, and professor should create a studying love in his students to help them become successful.
- Sea otter 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- A good sense of humor is an important for humans. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Tidal Power 71
- Discuss the advantages of promotion based on seniority or performance and provide your point of view 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...challenged while others take courses as an humiliating thing because they fear fai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9880239521 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60400566333 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491017964072 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.960323335 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333988617125 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129265790787 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154696623698 0.0737576698707 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230391336086 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882969526776 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.