how we should deal with these problems result from the teachers and meeting leaders.
As a colleage student, taking some classes and attending some meetings play an important part in our daily life. However, there are some occasions where some mistakes present in the process, which mislead the audience. The debate comes that how we should deal with these problems result from the teachers and meeting leaders. Personally speaking, I assert that it is necessary to interrupt and correct the mistake at once especially when considering the aim of study and atmosphere.
Firstly, it is beneficial to the study not only for the students and audience but also for the teachers themselves. There is no doubt that class and meeting provide us a platform of communication and learning from each other, the mistake should be pointed out for the development of future, which is beneficial to all. For example, if a mistake is made, the students might be confused and therefore lose the ability of following the next part of class. On the contrary, the immediate correction can lay a solid foundation for the understanding of the whole class. To sum up, immediate correction can provide a lot of benefit for all people.
Secondly, an active atmosphere of class can be achieved in this way. As we all know, on many occasions, the class and meeting are very boring because of too much professional knowledge. An active atmosphere can make great contribution to the efficiency and quality of learning process, which is demonstrated by a internet survey. If someone can proposal a different point of view in the class, especially one is against that of teachers, the other students will definitely be encouraged to take part in the class with high enthusiasm, making an improvement of class atmosphere.
Admittedly, waiting until the class or meeting is over and saying nothing have some advantages, like that no one will be awkward. Nevertheless, they both do harm to the learning of knowledge, which is the target of class and meeting. What is more important is that everything should serve the target.
In conclusion, based on the reasons I state above, I still insist that the best way on this occasion is interrupting and correcting the mistake immediately.
- whether the way of doing many things at the same time will make us lose the chance of achieving a good result 66
- whether a job which can lead to a secure and successful future is more easier to identify in the past compared with nowadays. 80
- whether a job which can lead to a secure and successful future is more easier to identify in the past compared with nowadays. 80
- For young people, some people claim that they make great effort to devote sufficient time to assisting their communities. 66
- whether all university students need to get a good comand of history courses. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring the aim of study and atmosphere. Firstly, it is beneficial to the study n...
^^^^
Line 9, column 187, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...use of too much professional knowledge. A active atmosphere can make great contri...
^
Line 9, column 311, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rning process, which is demonstrated by a internet survey. If someone can proposa...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, on the contrary, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04709141274 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88412613492 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548476454294 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.746343919 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.176470588 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4705882353 5.45110844103 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188548813761 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736971945158 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.200865759117 0.0737576698707 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977369047631 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120253466046 0.0645574589148 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.