If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1- riding bicycle or walking on foot2- recycling the waste3- buying local organic food

Essay topics:

If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?

1- riding bicycle or walking on foot

2- recycling the waste

3- buying local organic food

People of a country play an essential role in their society. They choose whom governs to them, what situation dominate in their country, what can they do in order to achieve maturity, and so on. When it comes to what is the best way for people of a society to take apart, many viewpoints come up. Some people believe that buying local organic food can help their society. Some other persist on recycling the waste is the best one. Finally, the third group think that riding bicycle or walking on foot could be the best. As far as I am concerned, I am a fan of the later point of view and believe that riding bike or walking on foot can make a big change in our society, which I will elucidate the rational of my viewpoint in ensuing paragraphs.

First of all, riding bicycle or walking has influence on global warming. We would not consume less fuel unless we use bicycle instead of cars. These fuels are leading dangerous gases such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, etc. emission through the atmosphere and make the ozone layer narrow, which all of these happenings cause global warming. The recent research has shown that the more people use fuel in order to go near places by their own car, the more global warming occurs and as the consequence to this tragedy, most of the livings are in exposure of extinct.

Furthermore, oil is one of the most vital energy resources for each country. If people just use their foot or ride bikes instead of start the engines, not only will they not utilize petrol but also they will maintain their national oil and all of this thing caused the next generation will utilize oil as we do. The following example vividly sheds light on what I was trying to say above, my uncle pays attention to these kinds of issues a lot and always says that we are responsible toward our next generation. Although they are rich family, he always persists on not consume much energy if there is no necessity. Hence, were we careful about our energy consuming, the people who are coming next would appreciate us for good.

To sum up, although people of a society can do several things in order to aid their society, the most indispensable one, in my opinion, is that walking on foot or biking. Therefore, I suggest that by doing mentioned stuffs neither cause global warming nor frustrate the nation oil.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-10 Negarmaleki 76 view
2019-05-24 neda.rrr 90 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Negarmaleki :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People of a country play an essential ro...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f my viewpoint in ensuing paragraphs. First of all, riding bicycle or walking ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e livings are in exposure of extinct. Furthermore, oil is one of the most vita...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng next would appreciate us for good. To sum up, although people of a society ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, third, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60191846523 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34751727859 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556354916067 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5051966819 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206638118571 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654456633543 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707550617672 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114776125297 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930722238446 0.0645574589148 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.