If you need to take a course, which professor's course would you like to take?
• a professor who was voted the most popular
• a professor who has just won an award for an outstanding research
Without a shadow of a doubt, higher education plays a pivotal role in the success of the country's industry. With this in mind, it is an axiomatic fact that in this university-industry chain, professors are the ones who expedite their way to a proper carrier. I, personally, prefer to work with a professor who devotes his or her time to research rather than attend a class for a popular teacher solely. There are several reasons which bear in mind, two of which will be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, a teacher due to their direct interaction with students can affect their life and carrier substantially. Devoting an immense amount of time to research, a professor is capable to pave the way for an avid student to build a future as a researcher. Moreover, the unprecedented burgeoning of technology and the hunger for new advances to facilitate daily life culminated in the rising demand for research. Consequently, a professor with a strong background in the research can inspire people to pursue a cutting-edge field of science and afford them an opportunity for a world-changing carrier. On the other hand, a professor who is renowned among students rarely does play a significant role in the progress of the country. Additionally, this popularity could be the result of an erroneous choice for some reason, a nice behavior toward students, a good grading system, to name but a two.
Another prominent motive to choose a professor for a course is the level of academic knowledge. The prerequisite for the research is an advanced degree of knowledge in the respective field. As a result, a talented professor in the research area can broaden students’ horizons and instruct them on practical science. Take my personal experience as a compelling illustration. When I was pursuing my bachelor's degree in the field of chemical engineering, I took a course with a renowned professor who was awarded several times for research. It was a life-altering choice for me because of the practical lessons which I learned in that class. To put it in other words, had not I attended that class, I would not have been succeeded in my carrier as a researcher. Conversely, a class with the most popular professor of the faculty did not broaden my knowledge owing to the fact that the popularity was the result of a fun atmosphere in his class.
To put it briefly, all the enumerated reasons converge to the point that I, personally opt for a professor with a background in the research due to the motivation and high level of practical knowledge. It would be unfair not to mention that the increasing need for a better life demands resourceful researchers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, conversely, first, if, moreover, so, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92273730684 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09971507675 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494481236203 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.400953377 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.65 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350640619109 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101058176813 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630440747061 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207954164596 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672060984846 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.