Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The personal and work-related challenges that young people face today are not any different from the challenges their parents and grandparents faced when they were young.
Some scientists speculate that the first challenge for humankind was making a fire, while others assert that the priority was to find a safe shelter. Without a shadow of a doubt, Challenges have accompanied humans in the course of history. An unanswered question in this area is whether the challenges for young people is the same as for their former generations or not. Despite the arguments asserting that for different generations, the difficulties remain constant, I vehemently believe otherwise, maintaining that younger generations are bombarded with a wide spectrum of new challenges every day. There are several reasons which bear in mind, two of which -that is- technology and overpopulation will be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that unprecedented burgeoning of technology in recent decades, which has substantially facilitated human life, came along with new drawbacks. To shed light on this issue, technology in general and the internet and social media, in particular, thoroughly altered human life. As an example, time was when my grandparents were using a telephone- which is completely obsolete these days- to talk with their kin once a month. However, nowadays, thanks to the new technological device, everyday-communication is commonplace. Nevertheless, a vital part of the puzzle is missing. The new technology has brought about challenges that were absent in the last decades. Rising the level of expectations, a strong tendency toward a luxury life, and facing inappropriate content is inevitable demerits of humankind's new inventions. These challenges are non-tangible for the older generation as an issue.
The second worthwhile momentous point, which deserves some words, is that an abrupt boom in the healthcare system and economic conditions lead to overpopulation, a new competition for exploiting limited resources on earth, which has dire consequences. To put another way, according to statistics, in the last centuries, due to the overpopulation, the share of natural resources and opportunities for any human is decreasing at a steep pace. As a result, a heated competition is formed for life. The more the competitors, the harder to get a job, the harder to get money. This factor, per se, could result in a catastrophic future. As an illustration, 30 years ago, when my father wanted to work as a teacher, the government readily hired him due to a shortage of human resources. On the other hand, today, seldom have I could find a job, let alone saving money.
To put it briefly, all the enumerated reasons converge to the point that new challengers for the youth are entirely different compared to challenges for young people in the last decades. Besides the reasons mentioned earlier, technology and overpopulation; However, there are some other reasons and examples, challenging the claim, which is not mentioned above. Undoubtedly, new challenges will emerge in the decades to follow for future generations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, briefly, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, as for, as to, in general, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2547.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33962264151 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24887666078 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 14.0 3.08781362007 453% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2127002986 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.739130435 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7391304348 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21739130435 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176709117187 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465373814171 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474032901673 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110300018238 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490127585537 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.