To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors- TPO 29
Universities play a pivotal role in the future of young people. Consequently, they should try to ameliorate the quality of their education. While most people argue that the salaries for the professors should not increase to use these sums of money for improving other parts of the university like libraries and so on, I am of the opinion that universities should spend more money on the university professors' salaries. In the following essay, I will vindicate my stance through two noticeable reasons.
To begin with, increasing the salaries of the professors can be a motivating force for teachers to improve their academic performance. In this regard, the learning efficiency of the students will increase, augmenting the quality of education. For instance, according to the research conducted, a group of professors paid the same salary as before. The other group, however, paid 20 percent more than their salary for about 4 months. The result got the researches with surprise. They realized that professors created techniques to improve their teaching resulting in the unbelievable rise in the students' grades. Therefore, the more motives professors have, the more productive they become, resulting in improvements in the education's quality.
Another equally significant point is that by offering more salaries to professors, universities can attract more skilled professors' attention which in turn, increases the quality of education. Furthermore, the established professors of the universities will become convinced to continue their job in these universities. What my father experienced is a compelling example to clarify this. My father was erudite in the field of biomedical engineering. He worked in the university for several years. However, the salary was so low that he could not meet his families' needs. As a result of this, he abandoned the university, finding a high-earning job in another university. Also, other knowledgeable professors of the university stopped teaching there, facing the university with a low quality of education. Had the university paid its professors more money, it could have enjoyed being among the high-ranking universities due to its high quality of education.
All in all, it is necessary for universities to pay more money for their professors. This is because having a high salary can be an incentive for professors to update their ways of teaching and because in this way, the university can both allure highly educated professors' attraction and retain its skilled professors. This is why I recommend universities spend more money on salaries for university professors.
- TPO 30 80
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 70
- TPO 23 80
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only 3 days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work 5 days a week for shorter hours TPO 30 70
- TPO 28 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
..., universities can attract more skilled professors attention which in turn, increases the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...versity can both allure highly educated professors attraction and retain its skilled profe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44362745098 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10701475785 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495098039216 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.7584008588 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5652173913 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7391304348 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69565217391 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544246009225 0.236089414692 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153781974729 0.076458572812 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136617173071 0.0737576698707 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365580825483 0.150856017488 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924430178376 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.