it is better to have broad knowledge in many academic subjects than to specialize in one subject
Nowadays, Human faces with vast and tremendous subjects. People's knowledge is invested and developed in multi-subjects area and have specific progress in different science courses. A lot of subjects and lessons are introduced at school and even taught by parents and public media to ensure that each member of society has minimum knowledge of any essential subjects. There is a challenging issue among scholars and all academic affairs about having broad knowledge of many things or being specialized in one specific subject. a lot of research, field survey and experiments have been conducted to answer this controversial question. In my own perspective, I think being specialized is better. Following sentences and reasons will elaborate on my opinion.
First of all, these days a lot of lessons are taught to the children by teachers or parents. Approximately all students after high-school would be familiar with many academic topics which has been discovered many years ago. Therefore to have specific influence on the society and make world better place to leave and solve crucial problems ones should be adept and specialized in one of the topics learned before. For instance, these days there a lot of diseases like cancers, human disabilities, viruses, genetic symptoms, etc. which will not be cured with simple knowledge. These issues required specific persons with great knowledge of these topics.
Second, by increasing the population, the competition atmosphere in finding job increased abruptly. Entrepreneur want people who are elite in their major. In job hunting, definitely if you are majored in specific topic, your chance of being hired will be increased. For example, my friend have Bachelor of Science degree in computer engineering with vast knowledge of other subjects. He requested for a job in a computer company and they just hired someone who had specific knowledge in machine learning which is very useful and important for them.
Third, with broad knowledge in many topics, the boundary of knowledge could not be developed. Cutting edge research conducted by specialized people and scholars who are elite in specific topics.
To summarize the points and reasons mentioned, I think being specialized in one topic is better as solving crucial problems and issues required deep understanding of the subject, and also improving and developing of science would not be achieved, except with vast and deep comprehended knowledge of the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 527, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...ng specialized in one specific subject. a lot of research, field survey and exper...
^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ich has been discovered many years ago. Therefore to have specific influence on the socie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s with great knowledge of these topics. Second, by increasing the population, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: ''.
... increased. For example, my friend have Bachelor of Science degree in computer engineeri...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 97, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...eing specialized in one topic is better as solving crucial problems and issues req...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore, third, for example, for instance, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39845758355 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85280800111 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54498714653 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2250789558 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5238095238 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302085383905 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819261226493 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104818503713 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176265338207 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105751834512 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.