In current era, ups and downs consist of our colorful life, and how to manage them is a critical point of discussion in the modern society. From where I stand, I believe that having a positive attitude towards failure is an essential part on the way to succeed. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore future in the following essay.
To begin with, a positive mindset is key to success. It is important to change the depressed and self-doubting attitude in the failure to be positive and upward, thereby reaping treasury and valuable experience helping us in the future. For example, I used to fail a chemical examination in high school. I felt extremely down and disappointed to my intelligence and deemed I was not a material of academic study. However, I gradually realized that indulging in negativity did not do any benefits to my intellectual growth. As a result, I began to be positive to my failure by analyzing the mistakes I made, acquired chemical knowledge I was not familiar with, and making study plans. Moreover, I reconsidered my study method which only depends on memorization of facts and details rather than thinking critically. Now, I am study biochemistry in a well-known university. Without reviewing my failure positively, I would have not reaped such a success.
Secondly, holding a positive attitude could eliminate the possibility of getting mental illness. Nowadays, there is an increasing number of people with phycological problems as they could not control their mindset in the hard time of life, trapping into the dangerous negative emotional world. My brother's personal experience provides a compelling example. My brother used to operate a technology company, which, unfortunately, was bankrupted encountering the downturn of economic depression. Because this massive failure, my brother could not fall asleep and unfortunately was diagnosed with depression. However, with the encourage from family and scientific treatment, my brother's mental situation became healthier. He told me that the turning point of to heal his mental illness was to correct his passive attitude to life to a positive and hopeful one. Therefore, a key to recover from deleterious psychological problem is regaining a positive and energetic mindset.
In sum, I still believe it is much essential to maintain happy and positive when we fail to obtain our goals.
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 3
- In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 73
- some people believe that it is an important part of a chid s education to go on field trips others think that a child s time is better spent in a classroom at school 73
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 80
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 14 76
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...iagnosed with depression. However, with the encourage from family and scientific treatment, m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19948186528 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04913035108 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9299389943 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119843804408 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330012135671 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380973947419 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851989414792 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469720381153 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...iagnosed with depression. However, with the encourage from family and scientific treatment, m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19948186528 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04913035108 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9299389943 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119843804408 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330012135671 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380973947419 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851989414792 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469720381153 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.