It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood.
Do you support or oppose this plan?
It is alleged by many that residential areas must be separated from commercial ones. According to those people having restaurants and other facilities in their near homes can be a pivotal factor to deteriorate the environment and the quality of life of the local community. Nevertheless, I believe that this thought is not plausible and the neighborhood will remain unscathed. Therefore, I support the plan to construct a new restaurant in my neighborhood. I feel this way for the following reasons.
Firstly, I like to eat out frequently to encounter my friends and relatives. Having many options of restaurants or cafes in my living area is an advantage for me because I would spend less time on traffic searching for places to eat with them. Furthermore, having a place to eat near home is beneficial when we get hungry at night. For example, last week I got hungry late at night and I had not any food at home. I decided to ask for food and then I had to go out to pick it up, unfortunately, it took half an hour. If there was a restaurant near my house it would not take so long time for me to eat at that time.
Secondly, having some facilities around our neighborhood might increase the real estate value of our houses. This emphasizes the prospective homebuyers' requirements and preferences. The majority of people, who are looking for a house to purchase, prefer neighborhoods that have restaurants, drugstores and supermarkets around it. This tendency is due to the advantage to avoid traffic in their daily lives. Hence, I would love if my house increases in value because of this improvement in my neighborhood.
Finally, the area might be safer with the enhancement in the movement and circulation of people and cars. Residential areas are usually quiet and bucolic which may be dangerous for people to walk alone to get home. For example, sometimes I walk to get home after work, consequently, the movement and all hustle and bustle may turn my walks home safer. It is generally claimed that the additional movement may disturb the residents of the area, however, I believe that if everybody respects local rules nobody will be prejudice. For instance, customers should not park their cars in forbidden places, the restaurant’s owner should respect the hours of attendance and maintain the proper volume of the music that is being played.
To sum up, I strongly support the plan to build a new restaurant in my neighborhood. This is because I will have an option more closely when I go out to eat, my house may increase in value and the movement generated by the clients may turn my walking safer. These concomitant advantages will ameliorate my daily life routine.
- Claim The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Reason Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea Write a respo 40
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 50
- TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - reduction in literature reading 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone.Which do you prefer? 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85032537961 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95861826107 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507592190889 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0906553036 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1666666667 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2083333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172395946336 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059056774988 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694101761112 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115502381986 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669485313505 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.