It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours

Essay topics:

It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours

It is no secret that having flexible working hours has played a prominent role in choosing the proper vocation. Due to its paramount importance, people have tried to elevate their productivity while they are at work by adjusting their working hours. Although some might keep up the idea that working for three days for long hours is a better choice, I firmly contend that working five days a week with shorter hours is a better idea. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory at the most outstanding reasons.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that working for fewer hours but more days is undoubtedly effective on worker’s productivity, increasing his outcome at the office. To put it in other words, an person’s productivity diminishes each hour he works, getting tired from all the mental or physical activities; however, working for more days is not a significant problem because a worker has more time to relax when gets home every day. My personal experience is a compelling example of this notion. About two years ago, I worked in a company that its employees were able to adjust their working time themselves, but it was obligatory that each employee must work at least 15 hours a week. At first, I scheduled to work seven and a half hours every Monday and Thursday; so, I was tremendously tired, getting back from work, and I could not process any new information after three hours working. Hence, I decided to change my schedule to work for three hours a day for five days. This approach aided me in being more productive, working, and that after-work tiredness surprisingly disappeared. This change would not have happened if I had stuck to my previous plan of working.

The second reason coming to mind is working five days a week for shorter hours will improve workers’ mental health, causing them to be more relaxed and less stressed. It is crystal clear the more an employee is at his office, the more he is under mental pressure owing to various work-related issues. This pressure has an adverse influence on a person’s health condition significantly; thus, he should plan to work for fewer hours a day to have time to relax his mind for the next day. A research carried out recently has underscored the fact that eighty percent of workaholics are suffering from severe physical and mental illnesses, having worked until the late hours of the day and faced different types of stress perpetually. Had these mentioned workaholics worked for proper hours a day, they would not have endangered their health condition, and tranquility will fill their lives.

To be short, all the reasons lead us to the fact that each person must pay heed to adjust his time, working at the office, and avoids working for longer hours to have more free days. That is because this approach not only decreases a person’s productivity but also harms his mental health.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-11 maryka72 60 view
2023-03-07 Hibahtabbaa 70 view
2023-02-27 kevin1105 66 view
2023-02-26 Hibahtabbaa 60 view
2023-02-23 can111 3 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user r.bostandoust :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t the office. To put it in other words, an person's productivity diminishes e...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, while, at least, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2444.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90763052209 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76133842901 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512048192771 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0998870972 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.631578947 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2105263158 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419297476281 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148144572466 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992657301778 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29035329033 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764972172508 0.0645574589148 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.