Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
These days, appearing as a criterion in most recruitments, teamwork skills become more and more necessary for every student. In my opinion, I truly find it much more effectively to work with a team than to do individually. Two following reasons could help clarify that opinion of mine.
In the first place, working with others could bring students a more comprehensive approach to the issue. To begin with, group working could help widen student’s thoughts by giving them the exposure to variety of opinions from other members. Among those ideas, the group could choose the best and their work’s quality would be definitely boosted. Furthermore, debate activities of group members could also make each opinion become clearer. Therefore, group working could help students both widen and deepen their thinking to completely solve each and every piece of the problem. For instance, in my project in the subject of Public health education, our group with seven members from Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia decided to make a comedy to raise awareness about hygiene in eating habits of our countries. An A for that comedy was an excellent result that none of us could achieve alone.
Secondly, group working could help maintain the productivity of student’s work throughout the project. By working in a group, students could do the tasks that they are good at, which will absolutely ameliorate their productivity. Besides, students could be easier to get rid of stress by discussing their difficult tasks with other members or simply having a short talk to encourage each other. Those things would definitely keep conserve student’s productivity, which is especially important in big projects. My best friend’s case could be the best example for this point. Every time he has a personal assignment, he always delays it and the deadlines threaten him with tons of work accumulated. But in our group project, because of the period deadlines that we set up to control every phase strictly, he could complete the tasks with no overnight working or stress. He always tells me that he especially enjoys group working.
To conclude, I am firmly of the opinion that teamwork is a more imperative skill due to its advantages in providing comprehensive approaches to the issues and maintaining work productivity.
- internet information 76
- The contribution of young people to the community 70
- You have enough money to purchase either a house or a business. Which would you choose to buy? Give specific reasons to explain your choice 70
- Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 76
- decline in literature readers 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 817, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'An' or 'A' is left.
Suggestion: An; A
...iene in eating habits of our countries. An A for that comedy was an excellent result...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2192513369 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88799760801 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561497326203 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7920307386 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.736842105 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239394004071 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843416865446 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508675191793 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149927714936 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364631715951 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.