It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree?
There is no doubt people agree that teachers are crucial for students' learning. However, sometimes it is difficult for a teacher to become both popular and effective in teaching. Because in order to help students acquire knowledge efficiently in a hour of class, teachers endeavor to demonstrate as many boring professional articles which make students out of concentration easily. Nevertheless, I believe with the following strategies, a teacher can become both charming and effective.
First, to possess a sense of humor. No one would not like a humorous person. An humorous teacher fills the class with delightful and positive atmosphere. According to a research, the atmosphere in the air affects people in the environment and give them energy and confidence to achieve goals. Therefore, taking the advantage of humor is beneficial of students. For example, my math teacher in the elementary school has the humor quality. I would never forget the way he taught us how to count. He made a fart in front of us and said it is "a" fart which is also counted as one. This teaching style encouraged us to believe that math is fun and practical. Moreover, all of the students were able to count from one to one hundred in half an hour.
Secondly, to care about students from the bottom of your heart. A well-rounded teacher should not only make an effort on academic education but also care about students. During a long period of studying some students may feel stressful and frustrated about working hard. Or more, there may be some life crisis happens to a student to make him fail the exam. As a wonderful and beloved teacher, she cares about her students. For example, my professor in graduate school is warm and full of kindness. I broke up with my boyfriend just 3 weeks before my oral presentation for the master degree. I was in a really bad mood and not concentrated on anything including my thesis and preparation of the oral presentation. Even though I said nothing to my professor, he made a great effort patiently to lead me to tell what happened to him. In addition, he was not only accompanied by me but also postponed my oral presentaion. I really appreciated what he did to me, so I decided to stay in school and get my doctorate.
In sum, although some people argue it is hard for a teacher to be liked by students and, on the other hand, to be disciplined, the strategies I mentioned are helpful for a teacher to reach the noble goal.
- TPO 40 Integrated 85
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree? 70
- T P O 50 integrated 3
- TPO INTEGRATED 44 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...udents acquire knowledge efficiently in a hour of class, teachers endeavor to dem...
^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...o one would not like a humorous person. An humorous teacher fills the class with d...
^^
Line 2, column 676, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...at math is fun and practical. Moreover, all of the students were able to count from one to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74592074592 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85474801576 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9449049466 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3076923077 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28318957657 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652008165109 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839384483279 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193210441243 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111292795117 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.