Loyalty is the most important quality in choosing a friend
There have been several disputed discussion on whether loyalty should be undertaken as a parameter while choosing the friend or not. As for everything, there are always two sides to every question. Personally, I believe that a friend should be fair towards you. I feel this for two reasons, which I explore in the following essay.
First of all, Loyal friends are always helpful; Moreover, these friends are kind in nature; additionally, these friends do not lie, so I believe that loyal friends are precious, just like a diamond. My personal experience is a compelling example of this; About ten years ago, I enrolled in the history class, where I got an assignment on Russian history. I found myself confused as Russian history was not familiar prompt, but my Classmate, whose name was Ms. Aditi, helped me out for the completion of this project. She became a savior for me, and got a prize from a teacher for wrote such a beautiful assignment; this incident made my mind that friend should be one who is loyal towards you.
Secondly, a friend should be one who helps in a difficult situation, and here a problematic situation means a job where your luck is not favored you. For better understanding, let us look at the example of My friend Mr. Sunny Yadav; he lost his father at the age of ten, and which created a massive responsibility on his shoulder towards his family. He was the only earning person in the family; however, he did not fulfill his family needs reason being his income was meager. He found a lady, in the work station who helped him a lot in his difficult situation, and that lady was his wife today.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that loyalty places a significant factor while deciding a friend. This is because if a person is loyal, then that person also includes the quality of helping others in any situation and because these person does not take advantage of the weakness of others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-13 | Siyuanzhao | 76 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | Siyuanzhao | 66 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | Ayasha_Khan | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | jullu | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Manu2525 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 66
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing researchand lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests ontelevision news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in t 71
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 75
- Despite the obvious advantages of technology social media has generated highly negative consequences To begin with social media has created a false sense of connectivity and friendship Additionally social media has encouraged new forms of harassment throu 68
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should be one who is loyal towards you. Secondly, a friend should be one who hel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 230, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this person' or 'these people', 'these persons'?
Suggestion: this person; these people; these persons
...ing others in any situation and because these person does not take advantage of the weakness...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, as for, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72861356932 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63582485768 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572271386431 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6218504435 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149062633839 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530489397295 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640912992639 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959940137738 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039409493886 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.