In the past several decades, the world has gone through massive changes on both a societal and an individual level. In this globalization era, learning a second language becomes much more critical than before. Some may suggest in a class setting, people can acquire linguistic knowledge more efficiently. However, I hold this view differently. People should learn a new language through interact with native speakers.
To begin with, being surrounded by native speakers help people understand local culture as well as their language. While traveling to a country where the language they studied is spoken natively, people can get in touch with diverse cultural traditions, like exotic festivals or special customs. Through these experiences, people will have a more comprehensive and objective understanding of this language, realizing language is not only a communication tool but also a carrier of civilization. All of this motivates people to learn language responsibly.
Moreover, people can communicate with local people personally in travel. During traveling, people can connect with local residents and even become friends with them, which provides people with an excellent opportunity to sharpen their language level and communication skill. Undeniably, having the bravery to open the mouse and talk with other people is a great step when studying a new language.
Admittedly, it is hard to deny that learning a language by taking classes enables people to develop a better grammar structure, helping them build up a more solid and native basement. Nevertheless, learning by doing is the most efficient way to acquire knowledge and skills. A recent study conducted by Harvard University has shown that when asked what the most efficient approach to acquiring a language skill is, fifty-eight percent of interviewees chose to speak with native speakers.
In a nutshell, it is undoubtedly a wiser choice to interact with native speakers for the reasons discussed above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46905537459 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94297105527 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615635179153 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6021221595 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9375 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223643116805 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076314639747 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055479341394 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112565521178 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641376906911 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.