World hunger is a complicated issue that has been frequently discussed but not resolved Some people believe the problem can only be addressed by wealthy governments and large companies Other people believe that each one of us can actually do something to

Essay topics:

World hunger is a complicated issue that has been frequently discussed but not resolved. Some people believe the problem can only be addressed by wealthy governments and large companies. Other people believe that each one of us can actually do something to solve the problem of hunger. Which opinion do you agree with? Why?

In the past several decades, the world has gone massive changes on both an individual and a societal level. Despite some tough problems have been solved, there are still some complex issue remainding, one of them is the world hunger. In order to figure out these problems, the debate over whether this problem can be addressed only by governments rather than individual is still fierce. In my perspective, I firmly believe the world hunger can only figured out by governments and large companies.
To begin with, governments and large companies have more capital and technology to deal with the world starvation. Nowadays, the development of the technology at a speed beyonde an average person's imagination. 3-D printer, one of the most ground-breaking technology, is the represent of Fourth Industrial revolution. Some regions are suffering from food shortage. In that case, 3-D printer can be use to convert insect protein, considered a excellent food resource, into more acceptable form and in turn to provide people with more food choice. Nevertheless, research and development is never a small change; the development and producing of 3-D printer need considerable money, which means they can only drive by a wealthy government or big companies.
Moreover, some may suggest individual can do something to tackle the problem of starvation. Undeniablly, even a little of individuals' voice can contribute to the situation, but if you ask me, I believe this problem should be the responsity of the wealthy government and the large company. The reasons why people pay taxes and transfer or release our power to the governement is they ought to represent people's will and realize it. If people want to address the world hunger problem, the government should to fulfil this will. As for large companies, it is a great opportunity to give back to the society. It is because there are plenty of people supporting them, they can have today's wealthy and scale. Hence, they need to take responsibility to these problems.
In a nutshell, it is undoubtedly that such problem can only be addressed and ought to be addressed by wealthy governments and large companies.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-25 57454751 74 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user 57454751 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...echnology at a speed beyonde an average persons imagination. 3-D printer, one of the mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the most ground-breaking technology, is the represent of Fourth Industrial revolution. Some r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...rtage. In that case, 3-D printer can be use to convert insect protein, considered a...
^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...rtage. In that case, 3-D printer can be use to convert insect protein, considered a...
^^^
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e to convert insect protein, considered a excellent food resource, into more acce...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...althy governments and large companies.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, as for, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18130311615 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9409301746 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543909348442 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9583849732 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.611111111 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425511065016 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120535802123 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893900217455 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265776127913 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703839074288 0.0645574589148 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...echnology at a speed beyonde an average persons imagination. 3-D printer, one of the mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the most ground-breaking technology, is the represent of Fourth Industrial revolution. Some r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...rtage. In that case, 3-D printer can be use to convert insect protein, considered a...
^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...rtage. In that case, 3-D printer can be use to convert insect protein, considered a...
^^^
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e to convert insect protein, considered a excellent food resource, into more acce...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...althy governments and large companies.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, as for, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18130311615 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9409301746 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543909348442 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9583849732 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.611111111 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425511065016 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120535802123 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893900217455 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265776127913 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703839074288 0.0645574589148 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.