mistake
When it comes to the question that how we treat in a meeting or classroom when the speakers say something wrong, it brings up a controversial doubt. opinions vary from one person to another. Some of then hold the opinion that they have to intruppt the teacher and inform them to correct their mistakewhile some of them think thai is better to say their mistake after everyone are gone and some of them prefere to do not say something about the mistake. I think in this kind of situation it is more apporatable to correct the mistake made by lecturer. I will explicate my reasons beh id this through the following essay.
The first thing that immediately comes into mind is that it is auditors right to receive correct information from the lecturer. Fore example, when a students that hear incorrect things from his or her teacher and correct the teacher's mistake it helps other students to not be confued later if they read or hear something different by their teacher speech.
The second reasons that makes me to hold this bilief is that the participitation of auditors in this way will be increased. For instance, when someone intruppts the speech and want to correct the mistake, other students can convey their opinin about mistake and since they participate in subject they can readily learn and memorize the subjet.
To wrap it up, if we take a galance into addvantages of correcting the mistake right away, it will be soon recognized that it is more worthwhile as auditions get correct information and they will can say their opinin and participate in subject.
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 76
- universities should give credit to sports and social activities as well as classes and libraries 60
- sea otter decline 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Opinions
...ng, it brings up a controversial doubt. opinions vary from one person to another. Some o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...n from the lecturer. Fore example, when a students that hear incorrect things from his or ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing different by their teacher speech. The second reasons that makes me to hold...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... readily learn and memorize the subjet. To wrap it up, if we take a galance into...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, while, for instance, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 272.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81985294118 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62237005757 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518382352941 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6345706852 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.1 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17202937077 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703792232965 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774880355466 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11533324969 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168217784027 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.