Money on pet and money on them
That some people want to spend money on their dogs and that money could be better spent elsewhere is incorrect, according to the remark in the prompt. A person's right to spend their money as they see fit is often cited as a reason why this is often the case. While the argument for saving money rather than splurging on pets is strong, this essay does not support it.
Instead of spending money on pets, it is best to save it. People's preferences and dislikes are shaped by their childhood experiences and what they've learned. They are not wasting their time if they have had pets since childhood and are now adults. Because, after all, it is their passion. Everything has a role to play in life, but it needs to be balanced. In order to care for pets, they would have to fork over money for their upkeep. Due to the fact that they are also living creatures, we cannot coexist with them There are many examples of people exploiting animals, such as a person who makes twelve lakhs a year (enough to live in India) but only spends a little part of it on their pets. So, they're spending their own money on things they enjoy. The street animals get no money. Now, if they're playing with dogs, snuggling up, or donating money, that's fine. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and they know what is best for them. They realise that money can't be saved, so they spend and enjoy themselves.
Despite this, there may be a number of reasons why this isn't the case. Many individuals are now maintaining pets, which we can see by looking at how much money they spend on them. Because of a rise in crime or because no one has the time to communicate to their loved ones, we shall learn. As a result, they choose to spend their free time and money on their dogs. Another key aspect is that because of this, the animals are also able to receive adequate food and not roam the streets and harm someone, as well as the lifecycle is present in our human existence if someone has kept cats because they have more rats in their house. Human stress would be reduced because cats would eat, and the life cycle would be controllable. As a last point, it's beneficial to spend money to the point where you're able to do it without feeling guilty. Assuming a person is hungry, giving money to a pet that they don't have would not sound nice.
As a whole, it appears to be a matter of personal choice and enjoyment, and not a lack of resources because they spend all their money on their animal. It's reasonable to think that maintaining a healthy sense of equilibrium in one's life is essential. Occasionally, this is not the case. However, the majority of the facts support this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-23 | ady | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | ady | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Christine hanna | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | ArmenM | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-28 | ahadmohammadi | 73 | view |
- The following appeared as a memorandum from the Human Resources director at Dexter Gorman Instruments a company that manufactures saxophones On this year s survey about work habits our employees tended to strongly agree with the idea that if they took les 58
- The following letter is from a group of Linford College alumni to the chair of the art department at the college In a recent survey of college graduates 90 percent agreed that participating in an internship increased their chances of finding a job after g 60
- Money on pet instead on them 70
- Money on pet and money on them 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Do you agree or disagree with this 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: A person; Persons
... according to the remark in the prompt. A persons right to spend their money as they see ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...by their childhood experiences and what theyve learned. They are not wasting their tim...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 699, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
... a little part of it on their pets. So, theyre spending their own money on things they...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 794, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...he street animals get no money. Now, if theyre playing with dogs, snuggling up, or don...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 853, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... dogs, snuggling up, or donating money, thats fine. Everyone is entitled to their own...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 969, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... best for them. They realise that money cant be saved, so they spend and enjoy thems...
^^^^
Line 6, column 57, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ere may be a number of reasons why this isnt the case. Many individuals are now main...
^^^^
Line 6, column 794, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...icial to spend money to the point where youre able to do it without feeling guilty. A...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 899, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hungry, giving money to a pet that they dont have would not sound nice. As a whol...
^^^^
Line 8, column 228, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ining a healthy sense of equilibrium in ones life is essential. Occasionally, this i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, after all, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45398773006 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25633648195 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513292433538 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6270809198 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6666666667 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.51851851852 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299996079467 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972809148847 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894083798592 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212700743021 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865358532656 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.