Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I mostly agree with this statement in the prompt. Solving the anticipated problem of the future would be better than solving today's problem.
In some cases and some fields, the more you solve the future issues, easily the issues of today would be solvable. Take Indian Cricket, for instance. When the coach of the team would be thinking of the issue as a future problem then they would be able to solve it properly which will lead to the solution of their present problem. For example, if the coach is thinking to keep a spinner for the match which is on the field where there is more probability of rain. Here, the coach is taking this problem as the future and training the spinner for a present problem. This phenomenon is not confined to the world of sport, however, it is also present in the academic field like the scientists of information technology where predicting and thinking about the future issue and developing the present things is helpful. For example, the tech people were knowing that till the late 20th century because they know that there is a high chance of relying on robots due to fastening technology. They are solving the issue of today by improving the technology for the future.
Focusing on the immediate problem would help in resolving future dilemmas. However, in most cases solving today helps in solving future difficulties. This is primarily because as focus on the scenario of today the future automatically gets resolves. Take the academic score for instance. If a student is scoring less in the mock tests, or academic exam of college then the concept of the student is lacking somewhere which would create a difficulty for them. But analysing the score and working on the weaker part would help the student to score high in the future in the same subject.
Focusing on the complications which are facing today would help in resolving the future situation. Moreover, numerous example illustrates that focus on today would make a better future. For illustration, think about the medical field where the health workers need to prevent the deterioration of the heath for a better future. For example, if a person is suffering from Covid-19 then they have to follow the medicine or treatment protocol as per the guidance of the health worker. If they would be able to cure the disease by solving today's issue then they are saving their future and complications which can come in the future. There are some more examples like an example of cooking if a cook knows which spice can make tasty food and they solve that issue by putting the correct amount of spice to make it delicious then problem of future where there was a possibility of the sadness of the customers they become happy by seeing the equivalent amount of spice in the food and shaving it deliciously. This shows that the present problem can help solve the future problem. In this way, the author has illustrated.
By concluding that, the author has supported the prompt and started that it is good to solve the present issue and then the future issues will also get solves. This is solved by giving the supporting ideas and explaining them with the help of an example.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 58
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons and or examples that could be used to challenge your position 50
- Money on pet and money on them 70
- Money on pet instead on them 70
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 846, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[2]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knew'
Suggestion: knew
...s helpful. For example, the tech people were knowing that till the late 20th century because...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 846, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s helpful. For example, the tech people were knowing that till the late 20th century because...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions which can come in the future. By concluding that, it is good to solve ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83741648107 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50458679132 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427616926503 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8254799265 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4347826087 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5217391304 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25802500121 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883922247368 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876321438466 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176638145458 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959350304367 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.