Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are
Advertising is an inextricable part of a business. Every company strives to show that their products are the best and there is no deficiency with their products. Some people believe that most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are, while others have the opposing opinion, they think the advertisements illustrate the reality of the products. As far as I am considered, I advocate the earlier viewpoint, which the rational behind my champion will be elucidated in ensuing paragraphs.
To commence with, good looking of products make them engaging. If one product looked perfect in advertising, most people would not pay attention whether it is worthwhile to pay for them or not. The recent research have shown that people, especially children, appealing most in the looks of products which is provided by advertisements, and they rarely think that how are the products really are. Therefore, advertisers by knowing this truth that good looking attracts people to buy something, make them pretend in good looking of products.
Another thing that deserve as much as the first reason to discuses is that economic matters make producers think about what they can do in order to sell their products more. As a result, not only do producers rely on produce better product, but also make account on the advertisements to show their products in the best way they can, even if these products not as much as great they seem in the advertisements. Hence, had advertisements shown the products very fine, the products would be sold dramatically.
To sum up with, advertisements are seeking to show the products much better than they reality, because of the fact not only does this lie advertising fascinate people to buy products, but also encourage the to pay for it and made their producers rich. By considering all of my word, do you still think advertisements should make products seem what they really are?
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 73
- The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. 65
- Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smart phones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys and playing outside with friends would be better for children’s development. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The job has a greater effect on one s overall happiness than the social life does 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, really, so, still, therefore, while, another thing, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05956112853 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89399254558 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523510971787 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8352124754 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.153846154 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528532459141 0.236089414692 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188115387037 0.076458572812 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15515526997 0.0737576698707 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347923420833 0.150856017488 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823534466407 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.