News sources today are less concerned about the accuracy of the NEWS
By and large, news sources are of paramount importance in people's life; people become aware of what is happening in their surroundings by relying on news sources. So great is the effect of the news on people's lives that news sources should be more careful about what they publish, to be able to provide the appropriate type of consciousness for people. In this regard, some controversies always arise whether the news sources today are less concerned about the accuracy of news or not. Many people think that news is today less precise than the past. Personally, I disagree with the statement. In the following lines, I will present and investigate two reasons to substantiate my response.
The first reason is that toady news sources are in vast competition. In other words, today, producing news for people transformed into business; these businesses always concern about their nets and benefits. All these business companies need to be trustable to attract more people and gain more benefits. Also, there are many other companies in this competition which will use any inaccuracy mistakes to weaken their rivals. Thus news sources care about the precision of their news to reduce their mistake as low as they can. In comparison, in the past, there were a few numbers of news sources, and they usually have little overlap with each other in their field or in their geographical location, so there was no incentive for them to compete with each other. To illustrate, consider a big city, such as Tehran. In Tehran, there are lots of news companies; each tries to be the most accurate one to earn people's confidence and heighten its reviews, which can lead to more income from advertisements that it receives.
The second reason of the equal importance is that now there are more regulations and inspections on the news sources. The news sources play a more important role in society than the past, hence any wrong news can agitate people and threaten the government's security. Therefore, to provide true news and prevent any mistake, governments pass some rules for the news companies and restrict them. Also, there are some companies whose function is investigating news accuracy and checking them out constantly. In comparison, in the past there were lower rules to restrict news companies. For instance, in my country, Iran, not until the culture ministry's representative company corroborates the news, could the news sources publish it. So, to prevent any penalties or any delay in publishing their news, news sources pay attention to the accuracy of their sources. If there is not scrutiny over these news sources, they may publish any news for their benefits.
To bring everything to a conclusion, having analyzed the reasons above, one can surmise that the news sources are more accurate today. Because not only are the news companies in a competition but also they are under magnifying glass consistently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-23 | prakriti malla | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | rahmi88 | 63 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | rahmi88 | 63 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | prakriti malla | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Toe_test | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not 44
- Tpo24 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthyeating habits. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or anew country because you will lose old friends. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...curacy mistakes to weaken their rivals. Thus news sources care about the precision o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ews can agitate people and threaten the governments security. Therefore, to provide true ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, by and large, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04761904762 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71625511098 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490683229814 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6578458634 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.583333333 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.508563477991 0.236089414692 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168975762876 0.076458572812 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134937372277 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343731329605 0.150856017488 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118542865893 0.0645574589148 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.