In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.

Essay topics:

In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.

It is a well-known fact that decision making process is a very complicated process. Although initially, it may seem simple, with controversy exists over the topic, writing about this complex subject is not very convenient because in which multifarious criteria come together as affecting agents. While some might allegate the opposite, but I agree with the statement. To illustrate my perspective of the statement, I will vindicate two reasons in the following article elaborately.
Worthy of mentioning, the first dimension is the advent of new technologies. Despite having an essential need to parents view, it is an indisputable fact that children have access to more information sources than they had in the past. It has made them more independent an also more reliable decision makers. In addressing the causation and pros and cons of the issue, a vast number of researches have been done comprehensively. The results demonstrate that having more knowledge based on the various information sources, children are more aware of the consequences of their choices. It can be inferred that, the more sources that you have, the better decisions that you can make. So, nowadays, in terms of reliability and better outcomes of choices, children are more successful.
In approaching this issue, apart from the reason mentioned above, one should consider another subtle point meticulously that children are more active in social events recently. It is inevitability undeniable that our way of thinking is ceaselessly and profoundly affected by social interactions and experiences. What's more, a very tangible example by means of which it can exemplify this facet is the high efficiency of the decisions that are made by socially active people. For example the people who live in bigger cities, due to more face to face confronts with other people, gathered more data, unconsciously and consciously, about the actions and their outcomes in diverse situation. So, they know how to make more appropriate decisions in many different situations. These social interactions, not only do they make children more independent, but also make them better decision makers.
In a word, by considering the coincidence of the two presented reasons with referable facts, we may draw the conclusion that the improved decision ability of children is commendably lucid. Although the effect amplitude of the subject varies from minor to major spectrum, more aptly-surveyed investigations are required to determine the other involving factors.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 nusybah 80 view
2020-01-21 liboooyang 70 view
2020-01-16 3dra 60 view
2020-01-10 Opak Pulup 70 view
2020-01-10 Opak Pulup 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Amid :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...by social interactions and experiences. Whats more, a very tangible example by means ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...w to make more appropriate decisions in many different situations. These social interactions, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, while, apart from, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40101522843 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04904636877 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8074374926 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52631578947 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168665775325 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507261359751 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565503872435 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897392354357 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051069956019 0.0645574589148 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.