Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
It is a well-known fact that teachers basically have been playing an essential role in a community. Although initially, it may seem simple, with controversy exists over the issue, writing about this complex is not very convenient because in which multifarious criteria come together as affecting agents. Even though, some might allegate the opposite, but I agree with the statement. To illustrate my perspective of the subject, I will vindicate two reasons in the following article elaborately.
The first dimension of the matter worth to point out is the number of the teachers. Despite having high rate of population grow, it is an indisputable fact the new born societies has grown a great deal of demand for teachers. In addressing causation and pros and cons of the subject, in 2018, a comprehensive and thorough research was done by a group of MIT scholars. The results objectively revealed that in most of the countries around the world, government have employed more teachers in comparison to the past. Having a leap in the number of them, teachers have not had the same respect from the society because their occupation was not considered to be special anymore, so as a result they lost their class between the people. So, like the demand and supply market, if you are increased by number, you would lose your credibility.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should consider another subtle point meticulously that values have change drastically by the last two decades. It is inevitability undeniable that people’s beliefs profoundly and ceaselessly affected by the advent of social media. What's more, a very tangible example by means of which it can exemplify this trait is the changes in behavior of the young generation toward their elder member of the family. The requirements of the new life style of people which is just a hollow and shallow show off of their life, are not compatible with the old customs and culture. So, not only does the recognition of values get alleviated, but also somehow some vital parts of it is eliminated.
In a word, by considering the coincidence of the two presented reasons with referable facts, we may draw the conclusion that the more time passes on, the more values we lose especially the part related to teacher's appreciation. Although, the effect amplitude of the topic varies from minor to major, further investigations are required to determine other involving factors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Abbas.ghaffari | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Maryam Madson | 61 | view |
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 90
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? -Interrupt and correct the mistake right away -Wait until the class or meeting is 3
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 86
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o 3
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...affected by the advent of social media. Whats more, a very tangible example by means ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06142506143 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87763976719 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601965601966 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3860118098 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.176470588 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115079408914 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296327266077 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403013685718 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633931860991 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329105563055 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.