People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity, such as the job you have never done before. Under this circumstance, do you prefer to work alone or work with others?
Nowadays, people often come across some tasks, which need them to handle with creativity. Some individuals choose to work on their own in this circumstance, while I am inclined to working with others.
First, cooperating with others will be more efficient. As is generally accepted, everyone has strengths and weaknesses, so people may not complete the task well if affected by their shortcomings when doing the job alone. Meanwhile, a team can avoid this kind of negative effects because all group members can do what they are good at and avoid doing things relevant to their shortcomings. In this case, a team can do this new work with a higher efficiency compared to an individual. For example, once I had to organize a small event in the Department of Mathematics. At the beginning, I planned to do it alone and did well in the preparation part but had no idea with how to advertise this event. In this case, I built up a group with a student major in advertisement, who helped me design the posters, and another one major in Art, who helped me draw the posters and put them In school. As a result, we completed the organization of the event, which was expected to be finished by myself for 5 days, within only 2 days and appealed many students to participating.
Second, we can glean more information about the work with more people and hence do this job better. Creativity is based on former experiences and a little bit innovation, so if we gather more information relevant to what we need to do, we may come up with a better approach to solve it. Clearly, a group of people can gather more information at a time compared to a single person, therefore teamwork can do the task better. For example, my brother was asked to write a paper about the dragon in certain television series in his biology class. He was permitted to form a group with three people while some students chose to do on their own. During those days, he and his team members watched that series once and once again and gained a lot of information. Moreover, they study a large number of papers about other animals relevant to dragon. In this case, they found a good aspect to finish their job whereas those who did the paper alone did not perform well.
In conclusion, we can do things better and more efficiently if we work in a group. Therefore, I prefer to work with others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | Boris | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | change_gc | 91 | view |
| 2019-04-28 | AnthonyStonehill | 40 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | Shirley Lu | 97 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All scientific discoveries should be shared by the whole world: governments and businesses should not keep the scientific discoveries secret.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 76
- You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two profe 73
- People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity such as the job you have never done before Under this circumstance do you prefer to work alone or work with others 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ty is based on former experiences and a little bit innovation, so if we gather more inform...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 777, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ot of information. Moreover, they study a large number of papers about other animals relevant to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58530805687 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68723827055 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514218009479 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4481302353 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256705603193 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086407415857 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663174086084 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181596021014 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106580936111 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.